Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 23, No. 3, 212-225 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03023003003

"Perfect Health" versus "Disease Free": The Impact of Anchor Point Choice on the Measurement of Preferences and the Calculation of Disease-Specific Disutilities

Joseph T. King, Jr., MD, MSCE

Mindi A. Styn, BS

Joel Tsevat, MD, MPH

Mark S. Roberts, MD, MPP

Background. During preference testing, some investigators use "perfect health" as the upper anchor point of their measurement scale ("Q scale"), whereas others use "disease free" ("q scale"), which can confound the interpretation and comparison of study results. Methods. We measured current health preferences among 74 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) on both the Q and q scales using the visual analogue scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), time tradeoff (TTO), and willingness to pay (WTP). Results. There were significant differences in mean Q and q scale values for the VAS, SG, and WTP (for all, P < 0.011); there were no significant differences for mean TTO values (P = 0.592). CSM accounted for 63% to 82% of total disutility, whereas other comorbidities accounted for 28% to 37%. Conclusions. Preferences for CSM differ when measured on the Q and q scales. Caution should be used when comparing and interpreting health values measured on scales with different upper anchors.

Key Words: measurement • preferences • standard gamble • time tradeoff • utility • visual analogue scale • willingness to pay


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
K. E. Bremner, C. A. K. Y. Chong, G. Tomlinson, S. M. H. Alibhai, and M. D. Krahn
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. G. Witney, G. J. Treharne, M. Tavakoli, A. C. Lyons, K. Vincent, D. L. Scott, and G. D. Kitas
The relationship of medical, demographic and psychosocial factors to direct and indirect health utility instruments in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, August 1, 2006; 45(8): 975 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
J. T. King Jr., J. Tsevat, J. R. Lave, and M. S. Roberts
Willingness to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year: Implications for Societal Health Care Resource Allocation
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 667 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 StrokeHome page
J. T. King Jr, J. Tsevat, and M. S. Roberts
Preference-Based Quality of Life in Patients With Cerebral Aneurysms
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
P. Mileman and W. van den Hout
Preferences for oral health states: effect on prescribing periapical radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]