|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Modeling the Public Health Response to Bioterrorism: Using Discrete Event Simulation to Design Antibiotic Distribution Centers
Nathaniel Hupert, MD, MPH
411 E. 69th St., New York, NY 10021 nah2005{at}
Alvin I. Mushlin, MD, ScM
Mark A. Callahan, MD
Background. Post-exposure prophylaxis is a critical component of the public health response to bioterrorism. Computer simulation modeling may assist in designing antibiotic distribution centers for this task. Methods. The authors used discrete event simulation modeling to determine staffing levels for entry screening, triage, medical evaluation, and drug dispensing stations in a hypothetical antibiotic distribution center operating in low medium, and high disease prevalence bioterrorism response scenarios. Patient arrival rates and processing times were based on prior mass prophylaxis campaigns. Multiple sensitivity analyses examined the relation-ship between average staff utilization rate (UR) (i.e., percentage of time occupied in patient contact) and capacity of the model to handle surge arrivals. Results. Distribution center operation required from 93 staff for the low-prevalence scenario to 111 staff for the high-prevalence scenario to process approximately 1000 people per hour within the baseline model assumptions. Excess capacity to process surge arrivals approximated (1-UR) for triage staffing. Conclusions. Discrete event simulation modeling is a useful tool in developing the public health infrastructure for bioterrorism response. Live exercises to validate the assumptions and outcomes presented here may improve preparedness to respond to bioterrorism.
Key Words: bioterrorism mass prophylaxis discrete event simulation modeling public health
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 22, No. 5 suppl,
S17-S25 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/027298902237709

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hupert, W. Xiong, K. King, M. Castorena, C. Hawkins, C. Wu, and J. A. Muckstadt
Uncertainty and Operational Considerations in Mass Prophylaxis Workforce Planning
Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness,
December 1, 2009;
3(Supplement_2):
S121 - S131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Washington
Evaluating the Capability and Cost of a Mass Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination Clinic via Computer Simulation
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2009;
29(4):
414 - 423.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Brandeau, J. H. McCoy, N. Hupert, J.-E. Holty, and D. M. Bravata
Recommendations for Modeling Disaster Responses in Public Health and Medicine: A Position Paper of the Society for Medical Decision Making
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2009;
29(4):
438 - 460.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Wright, M. J. Liberatore, and R. L. Nydick
A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security
Interfaces,
November 1, 2006;
36(6):
514 - 529.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Lee, S. Maheshwary, J. Mason, and W. Glisson
Large-Scale Dispensing for Emergency Response to Bioterrorism and Infectious-Disease Outbreak
Interfaces,
November 1, 2006;
36(6):
591 - 607.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Craft, L. M. Wein, and A. H. Wilkins
Analyzing Bioterror Response Logistics: The Case of Anthrax
Management Science,
May 1, 2005;
51(5):
679 - 694.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hupert, G. M.L. Bearman, A. I. Mushlin, and M. A. Callahan
Accuracy of Screening for Inhalational Anthrax after a Bioterrorist Attack
Ann Intern Med,
September 2, 2003;
139(5_Part_1):
337 - 345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Owens
Analytic Tools for Public Health Decision Making
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2002;
22(5_suppl):
S3 - S10.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|