Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Primary Prevention Drug Therapy: Can It Meet Patients’ Requirements for Reduced Risk?

Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas, PhD

Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

J. Michael Paterson, MSc

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Judy A. Carter, BScPharm

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Antoni Basinski, MD, PhD

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Martin G. Myers, MD

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Gordon D. Hardacre, MD

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Earl V. Dunn, MD

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Ralph B. D’Agostino, PhD

Department of Mathematics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

Philip A. Wolf, MD

Departments of Neurology and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The objective was to identify, in primary prevention, patients whose "required risk reduction" (ReqRR) is greater than the "achievable risk reduction" (ARR) that cholesterol-lowering or antihypertensive medication could provide. Individualized estimates of 10-year coronary heart disease or stroke risk were derived for 66 hypercholesterolemic (HC) and 64 hypertensive (HT) patients without symptomatic cardiovascular disease. These estimates were used in trade-off tasks identifying each individual’s ReqRR. Then individual ARRs were estimated (in HC patients by assuming total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio reductions to 5.0; in HT patients by assuming systolic blood pressure reductions to 120 mmHg). 12 (18%) HC and 12 (19%) HT subjects would refuse medication regardless of the risk reduction offered. Of the remaining patients, 15/54 (28%; 95% C.I.: 16-40%) HC and 19/52 (37%; 95% C.I.: 24-51%) HT subjects were "over-requirers," in that their ReqRR/ARR ratio was 1.5. There may be a notable proportion of patients whose ReqRR is considerably greater than what is achievable, implying that decision aids may help individuals clarify preferences about accepting/refusing medication for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Key Words: treatment preferences • hypertension • hypercholesterolemia • primary prevention • patients’ decision aids • trade-off technique

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 22, No. 4, 326-339 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200411


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. A. Dolan, V. Sabesan, S. L. Weinstein, and K. F. Spratt
Preference Assessment of Recruitment into a Randomized Trial for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2594 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]