This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jansen, S. J. T. Articles by Stiggelbout, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jansen, S. J. T. Articles by Stiggelbout, A. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Breast Cancer Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Stability of Patients’ Preferences for Chemotherapy

The Impact of Experience

Department of Clinical Oncology, Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Job Kievit, MD, PhD

Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Marianne A. Nooij, MD

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Anne M. Stiggelbout, PhD

Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

Background. Studies have shown that utilities for a particular treatment, elicited by means of a hypothetical treatment scenario, may remain stable within the same patients when examined before, during, and after experiencing that treatment (within-group stability). However, other studies have found that utilities for a particular health state may differ between patient groups who are and who are not experiencing the particular health state (between-group differences). Objective. The authors evaluated this apparent contradiction in the case of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A related purpose was to examine whether a chemotherapy scenario adequately reflects the patients’ own experiences with chemotherapy. Method. Forty-three patients with early-stage breast cancer evaluated their actually experienced health state and a chemotherapy scenario before, during, and after undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group). A control group of 51 patients for whom chemotherapy was not part of the treatment plan was interviewed at similar points in time. Utilities were elicited by means of a visual analog scale (VAS), a chained time trade-off (TTO), and a chained standard gamble (SG). Results. The utilities for the chemotherapy scenario remained relatively stable over time in the 2 patient groups. Furthermore, the chemotherapy scenario was evaluated more positively by patients in the chemotherapy group than by control patients (e.g., utilities before chemotherapy: VAS 0.69 vs. 0.50, TTO 0.88 vs.0.50, SG 0.92 vs. 0.58, all Ps < 0.01). Finally, patients in the chemotherapy group evaluated their actually experienced health states during chemotherapy higher than the chemotherapy scenario that was assessed at the same time (VAS 0.79 vs. 0.69, TTO 0.93 vs. 0.87, SG 0.97 vs. 0.96, all Ps < 0.05). Conclusions. Both within-group stability and between-group differences were found. A possible explanation for within-group stability may be that the chemotherapy scenario did not fully correspond to the patients’ actual experiences with chemotherapy ("noncorresponding description"). Therefore, preferences did not change even when the patients’ own clinical health status had changed. The between-group differences may be explained by "anticipated adaptation." Both explanations may work together to explain why utilities remain stable within the same patients but differ between different patient groups.

Key Words: stability • utility assessment • standard gamble • time trade-off

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 21, No. 4, 295-306 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. N. Wittink, K. H. Morales, L. A. Meoni, D. E. Ford, N.-y. Wang, M. J. Klag, and J. J. Gallo Stability of Preferences for End-of-Life Treatment After 3 Years of Follow-up: The Johns Hopkins Precursors Study Arch Intern Med, October 27, 2008; 168(19): 2125 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Rohrer, S. H. Lim, and F. A. Bock Medical Condition Is Related to Treatment Preference in Cancer Patients: Implications for Quality Assessment American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, February 1, 2007; 24(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Kostopoulou The Transient Nature of Utilities and Health Preferences Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 304 - 306. [PDF]

				J. H. Goldberg Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.-R. Lin, H.-F. Hwang, K.-P. Chung, C. Huang, and C.-Y. Chen Rating Scale, Standard Gamble, and Time Trade-off for People With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries Physical Therapy, March 1, 2006; 86(3): 337 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Yabroff, W. F. Lawrence, S. Clauser, W. W. Davis, and M. L. Brown Burden of Illness in Cancer Survivors: Findings From a Population-Based National Sample J Natl Cancer Inst, September 1, 2004; 96(17): 1322 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J.T. Jansen, W. Otten, and A. M. Stiggelbout Review of Determinants of Patients' Preferences for Adjuvant Therapy in Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2004; 22(15): 3181 - 3190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Mileman and W. van den Hout Preferences for oral health states: effect on prescribing periapical radiographs Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 32(6): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Baron, D. A. Asch, A. Fagerlin, C. Jepson, G. Loewenstein, J. Riis, M. G. Stineman, and P. A. Ubel Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study Med Decis Making, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 422 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Saigal, B. L. Stoskopf, E. Burrows, D. L. Streiner, and P. L. Rosenbaum Stability of Maternal Preferences for Pediatric Health States in the Perinatal Period and 1 Year Later Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2003; 157(3): 261 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]