|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples
Isaac M. Lipkus, PhD
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Greg Samsa, PhD
Department of Community and Family Medicine
Barbara K. Rimer, DrPH
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, and the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, The National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Background. Numeracy, how facile people are with basic probability and mathematical concepts, is associated with how people perceive health risks. Performance on simple numeracy problems has been poor among populations with little as well as more formal education. Here, we examine how highly educated participants performed on a general and an expanded numeracy scale. The latter was designed within the context of health risks. Method. A total of 463 men and women aged 40 and older completed a 3-item general and an expanded 7-item numeracy scale. The expanded scale assessed how well people 1) differentiate and perform simple mathematical operations on risk magnitudes using percentages and proportions, 2) convert percentages to proportions, 3) convert proportions to percentages, and 4) convert probabilities to proportions. Results. On average, 18% and 32% of participants correctly answered all of the general and expanded numeracy scale items. Approximately 16% to 20% incorrectly answered the most straightforward questions pertaining to risk magnitudes (e.g., Which represents the larger risk: 1%, 5%, or 10%?). A factor analysis revealed that the general and expanded risk numeracy items tapped the construct of global numeracy. Conclusions. These results suggest that even highly educated participants have difficulty with relatively simple numeracy questions, thus replicating in part earlier studies. The implication is that usual strategies for communicating numerical risk may be flawed. Methods and consequences of communicating health risk information tailored to a person’s level of numeracy should be explored further.
Key Words: risk • numeracy • communication
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 21, No. 1,
37-44 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100105
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. L. Sheridan, A. J. Viera, M. J. Krantz, C. L. Ice, L. E. Steinman, K. E. Peters, L. A. Kopin, D. Lungelow, and for the Cardiovascular Health Intervention Researc
The Effect of Giving Global Coronary Risk Information to Adults: A Systematic Review
Arch Intern Med,
February 8, 2010;
170(3):
230 - 239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. R. Samanez-Larkin, C. M. Kuhnen, D. J. Yoo, and B. Knutson
Variability in Nucleus Accumbens Activity Mediates Age-Related Suboptimal Financial Risk Taking
J. Neurosci.,
January 27, 2010;
30(4):
1426 - 1434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. McCaffery, S. K. Smith, and M. Wolf
The Challenge of Shared Decision Making Among Patients With Lower Literacy: A Framework for Research and Development
Med Decis Making,
January 1, 2010;
30(1):
35 - 44.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Lipkus and E. Peters
Understanding the Role of Numeracy in Health: Proposed Theoretical Framework and Practical Insights
Health Educ Behav,
December 1, 2009;
36(6):
1065 - 1081.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Garcia-Retamero and M. Galesic
Communicating Treatment Risk Reduction to People With Low Numeracy Skills: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
Am J Public Health,
December 1, 2009;
99(12):
2196 - 2202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Dillard, A. M. Midboe, and W. M. P. Klein
The Dark Side of Optimism: Unrealistic Optimism About Problems With Alcohol Predicts Subsequent Negative Event Experiences
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2009;
35(11):
1540 - 1550.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. Ben-Joseph, S. A. Dowshen, and N. Izenberg
Do Parents Understand Growth Charts? A National, Internet-Based Survey
Pediatrics,
October 1, 2009;
124(4):
1100 - 1109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Obrecht, G. B. Chapman, and R. Gelman
An encounter frequency account of how experience affects likelihood estimation
Mem Cognit,
July 1, 2009;
37(5):
632 - 643.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Keller and M. Siegrist
Effect of Risk Communication Formats on Risk Perception Depending on Numeracy
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2009;
29(4):
483 - 490.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Galesic, G. Gigerenzer, and N. Straubinger
Natural Frequencies Help Older Adults and People with Low Numeracy to Evaluate Medical Screening Tests
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2009;
29(3):
368 - 371.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Kilbridge, G. Fraser, M. Krahn, E. M. Nelson, M. Conaway, R. Bashore, A. Wolf, M. J. Barry, D. A. Gong, R. F. Nease Jr, et al.
Lack of Comprehension of Common Prostate Cancer Terms in an Underserved Population
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2009;
27(12):
2015 - 2021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. T. Brewer, J. P. Tzeng, S. E. Lillie, A. S. Edwards, J. M. Peppercorn, and B. K. Rimer
Health Literacy and Cancer Risk Perception: Implications for Genomic Risk Communication
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2009;
29(2):
157 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Cuite, N. D. Weinstein, K. Emmons, and G. Colditz
A Test of Numeric Formats for Communicating Risk Probabilities
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 2008;
28(3):
377 - 384.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Cavanaugh, M. M. Huizinga, K. A. Wallston, T. Gebretsadik, A. Shintani, D. Davis, R. P. Gregory, L. Fuchs, R. Malone, A. Cherrington, et al.
Association of Numeracy and Diabetes Control
Ann Intern Med,
May 20, 2008;
148(10):
737 - 746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Kim, E. J. Perez-Stable, S. Wong, S. Gregorich, G. F. Sawaya, J. M. E. Walsh, and C. P. Kaplan
Association Between Cancer Risk Perception and Screening Behavior Among Diverse Women
Arch Intern Med,
April 14, 2008;
168(7):
728 - 734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gigerenzer, W. Gaissmaier, E. Kurz-Milcke, L. M. Schwartz, and S. Woloshin
Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics
Psychological Science in the Public Interest,
November 1, 2007;
8(2):
53 - 96.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S Ancker and D. Kaufman
Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
JAMIA,
November 1, 2007;
14(6):
713 - 721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Hamm, D. E. Bard, E. Hsieh, and H. F. Stein
Contingent or Universal Approaches to Patient Deficiencies in Health Numeracy
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
635 - 637.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fagerlin, B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, P. A. Ubel, A. Jankovic, H. A. Derry, and D. M. Smith
Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
672 - 680.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, D. M. Smith, P. A. Ubel, and A. Fagerlin
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
663 - 671.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Lipkus
Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
696 - 713.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, and H. G. Welch
The Drug Facts Box: Providing Consumers with Simple Tabular Data on Drug Benefit and Harm
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
655 - 662.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Barnato, H. A. Llewellyn-Thomas, E. M. Peters, L. Siminoff, E. D. Collins, and M. J. Barry
Communication and Decision Making in Cancer Care: Setting Research Priorities for Decision Support/Patients' Decision Aids
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
626 - 634.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Hibbard, E. Peters, A. Dixon, and M. Tusler
Consumer Competencies and the Use of Comparative Quality Information: It Isn't Just about Literacy
Med Care Res Rev,
August 1, 2007;
64(4):
379 - 394.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek
Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception
CA Cancer J Clin,
May 1, 2007;
57(3):
147 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Peters, J. Hibbard, P. Slovic, and N. Dieckmann
Numeracy Skill And The Communication, Comprehension, And Use Of Risk-Benefit Information
Health Aff.,
May 1, 2007;
26(3):
741 - 748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Peters, N. Dieckmann, A. Dixon, J. H. Hibbard, and C. K. Mertz
Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers
Med Care Res Rev,
April 1, 2007;
64(2):
169 - 190.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. R. Arkes, V. A. Shaffer, and M. A. Medow
Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Aid
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2007;
27(2):
189 - 202.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S Ancker, Y. Senathirajah, R. Kukafka, and J. B Starren
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review
JAMIA,
November 1, 2006;
13(6):
608 - 618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Gurmankin Levy, J. Shea, S. V. Williams, A. Quistberg, and K. Armstrong
Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
October 1, 2006;
15(10):
1893 - 1898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. Goldman, D. R. Parker, C. B. Eaton, J. M. Borkan, R. Gramling, R. T. Cover, and D. K. Ahern
Patients' Perceptions of Cholesterol, Cardiovascular Disease Risk, and Risk Communication Strategies
Ann. Fam. Med,
May 1, 2006;
4(3):
205 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hay, E. Shuk, G. Cruz, and J. Ostroff
Thinking Through Cancer Risk: Characterizing Smokers' Process of Risk Determination
Qual Health Res,
October 1, 2005;
15(8):
1074 - 1085.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Gurmankin, M. Helweg-Larsen, K. Armstrong, S. E. Kimmel, and K. G. M. Volpp
Comparing the Standard Rating Scale and the Magnifier Scale for Assessing Risk Perceptions
Med Decis Making,
September 1, 2005;
25(5):
560 - 570.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fagerlin, C. Wang, and P. A. Ubel
Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People's Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2005;
25(4):
398 - 405.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, and H. G. Welch
Can Patients Interpret Health Information? An Assessment of the Medical Data Interpretation Test
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2005;
25(3):
290 - 300.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N D Weinstein, S E Marcus, and R P Moser
Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk
Tob. Control,
February 1, 2005;
14(1):
55 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Gramling, J. E. Irvin, J. Nash, C. Sciamanna, and L. Culpepper
Numeracy and Medicine: Key Family Physician Attitudes about Communicating Probability with Patients
J Am Board Fam Med,
November 1, 2004;
17(6):
473 - 473.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Gurmankin, J. Baron, and K. Armstrong
The Effect of Numerical Statements of Risk on Trust and Comfort with Hypothetical Physician Risk Communication
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 2004;
24(3):
265 - 271.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Fagerlin, D. Rovner, S. Stableford, C. Jentoft, J. T. Wei, and M. Holmes-Rovner
Patient Education Materials about the Treatment of Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review
Ann Intern Med,
May 4, 2004;
140(9):
721 - 728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Robbins
Adult Patients Understand Relative Risk Reduction Better than Number Needed to Treat
AAP Grand Rounds,
March 1, 2004;
11(3):
33 - 34.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
