|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Representing Both First- and Second-order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of Patients
Elkan F. Halpern, PhD
Milton C. Weinstein, PhD
Maria G.M. Hunink, MD, PhD
G. Scott Gazelle, MD, PhD
Actual implementation of probabilistic sensitivity analysis may lead to misleading or improper conclusions when it is applied to groups of patients rather than individual patients. The practice of combining first- and second-order simulations when modeling the outcome for a group of more than one patient yields an erroneous marginal distribution whenever the parameter values are randomly sampled for each patient while the results are presented as simulated means for the group of patients. This practice results in underrepresenting the second-order uncertainty. It may also distort the shape (especially the symmetry or extent of the tails) in the simulated distribution. As a result, it may lead to premature or incorrect conclusions of superiority. It may also result in inappropriate estimates of the value of further research to inform parameter values. Key words: Simulation; probabilistic sensitivity analysis; Monte Carlo; confidence interval ; cost-effectiveness; implementation. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:314-322)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 20, No. 3,
314-322 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000308

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. van den Hout and F. E. Matthews
Estimating dementia-free life expectancy for Parkinson's patients using Bayesian inference and microsimulation
Biostat.,
October 1, 2009;
10(4):
729 - 743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Losina, R. P. Walensky, C. L. Kessler, P. S. Emrani, W. M. Reichmann, E. A. Wright, H. L. Holt, D. H. Solomon, E. Yelin, A. D. Paltiel, et al.
Cost-effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States: Patient Risk and Hospital Volume
Arch Intern Med,
June 22, 2009;
169(12):
1113 - 1121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Cohen and M. R. Reynolds
Interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
December 16, 2008;
52(25):
2119 - 2126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vera-Llonch, E. Massarotti, F. Wolfe, N. Shadick, R. Westhovens, O. Sofrygin, R. Maclean, Y. Yuan, and G. Oster
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate
Rheumatology,
April 1, 2008;
47(4):
535 - 541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Schousboe, J. A. Nyman, R. L. Kane, and K. E. Ensrud
Cost-Effectiveness of Alendronate Therapy for Osteopenic Postmenopausal Women
Ann Intern Med,
May 3, 2005;
142(9):
734 - 741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, U. Siebert, and M. T. Beinfeld
Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies
Radiology,
May 1, 2005;
235(2):
361 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Lorch, A. Cnaan, and K. Barnhart
Cost-Effectiveness of Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Management of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn
Pediatrics,
August 1, 2004;
114(2):
417 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Goldie
Chapter 15: Public Health Policy and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
June 1, 2003;
2003(31):
102 - 110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|