|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Modal Preferences Predict Elderly Patients' Life-sustaining Treatment Choices as Well as Patients' Chosen Surrogates Do
William D. Smucker, MD
Renate M. Houts, PhD
Joseph H. Danks, PhD
Peter H. Ditto, PhD
Angela Fagerlin, MA
Kristen M. Coppola, PhD
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of an actuarial method of predicting patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment with the accuracy of surrogate decision makers. 401 outpatients 65 years old or older (mean = 73 years) and their self-designated surrogate decision makers recorded preferences for four life-sustaining medical treatments in nine hypothetical illness scenarios. The surrogates did not predict the patients' preferences more accurately than did an actuarial model using modal preferences. Surrogates' accuracy was not influenced by the use of an advance directive (AD) or discussion of life-sustaining treatment choices. In clinical practice, an actuarial model could assist surrogate decision makers when a patient has no AD, an AD is unavailable, a patient's AD is vague or describes treatment choices for only extreme or unlikely disease states, no proxy decision maker has been designated, or a patient was never competent. Key words: decision making; advance directives; substituted judgment; elderly; surrogates; actuarial. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:271- 280)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 20, No. 3,
271-280 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000303

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Z. Marks and H. R. Arkes
Patient and Surrogate Disagreement in End-of-Life Decisions: Can Surrogates Accurately Predict Patients' Preferences?
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2008;
28(4):
524 - 531.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Matsui, K. L. Braun, and H. Karel
Comparison of End-of-Life Preferences Between Japanese Elders in the United States and Japan
J Transcult Nurs,
April 1, 2008;
19(2):
167 - 174.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. H. Ditto, J. A. Jacobson, W. D. Smucker, J. H. Danks, and A. Fagerlin
Context Changes Choices: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Hospitalization on Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2006;
26(4):
313 - 322.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. I. Shalowitz, E. Garrett-Mayer, and D. Wendler
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
Arch Intern Med,
March 13, 2006;
166(5):
493 - 497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y.H. Kim, P. S. Appelbaum, D. V. Jeste, and J. T. Olin
Proxy and Surrogate Consent in Geriatric Neuropsychiatric Research: Update and Recommendations
Am J Psychiatry,
May 1, 2004;
161(5):
797 - 806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Cook, G. Rocker, J. Marshall, P. Sjokvist, P. Dodek, L. Griffith, A. Freitag, J. Varon, C. Bradley, M. Levy, et al.
Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation in Anticipation of Death in the Intensive Care Unit
N. Engl. J. Med.,
September 18, 2003;
349(12):
1123 - 1132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Houts, W. D. Smucker, J. A. Jacobson, P. H. Ditto, and J. H. Danks
Predicting Elderly Outpatients' Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 2002;
22(1):
39 - 52.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. H. Ditto, J. H. Danks, W. D. Smucker, J. Bookwala, K. M. Coppola, R. Dresser, A. Fagerlin, R. M. Gready, R. M. Houts, L. K. Lockhart, et al.
Advance Directives as Acts of Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Arch Intern Med,
February 12, 2001;
161(3):
421 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|