Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yaniv, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yaniv, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 20, No. 2, 216-227 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000207


Other

Withholding Information from Cancer Patients as a Physician's Decision under Risk

Gideon Yaniv, PhD

When cancer is diagnosed, the physician may face a dilemma regarding disclosure of information to the patient. While he or she may feel a responsibility to maintain the patient's hope, even through the withholding of information, there is a risk involved: if treatment fails, the patient will eventually know the truth. Patients who would rather live their final days in peace rather than undergo unpleasant treatment of an uncertain nature may be furious and frustrated that they have been deprived of this liberty, ending their lives feeling worse than they would have had they been told the truth at the outset. The author applies three theories of decision making under uncertamty (expected utility theory, prospect theory, and regret theory) to the physician's problem of whether and to what extent to withhold information from a cancer patient, deriving comparative predictions with regard to the relationships between the physician's behavior and illness, patient, and physician characteristics. The results help explain why physicians whose norm of behavior is full disclosure sometimes opt to withhold information and why junior physicians are more likely to disclose the truth than their senior colleagues, as well as the empirical findings that physicians tend to disclose more truthful information to patients the greater the severity of illness and the more inquisitive the patient. Key words: cancer patient; information disclosure/withholding; risk/uncertamty; expected-utility theory; prospect theory; regret theory. (Med Decis Making 2000;20: 216-227)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
I. Hozo and B. Djulbegovic
When Is Diagnostic Testing Inappropriate or Irrational? Acceptable Regret Approach
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 540 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. B. Rasiel, K. P. Weinfurt, and K. A. Schulman
Can Prospect Theory Explain Risk-Seeking Behavior by Terminally Ill Patients?
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [PDF]