Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldman-Stewart, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mackillop, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feldman-Stewart, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mackillop, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

What Questions Do Patients with Curable Prostate Cancer Want Answered?

Deb Feldman-Stewart, PhD

Michael D. Brundage, MD

Charles Hayter, MD

Patti Groome, PhD

J. Curtis Nickel, MD

Heather Downes, MD

William J. Mackillop, MD

Purpose. To determine the questions that recently diagnosed early-stage prostate cancer patients think should be addressed with patients like themselves. Study population. 56 patients diagnosed as having early-stage prostate cancer within the previous year. Methods. Surveys distributed to the patients included 93 questions that might be considered important. Respondents judged the importance (essential / desired / no opinion / avoid) of addressing each question, and indicated why those "essential" or "desired" were important. Results. 38 patients (68%) responded. Agreement on question importance, overall, was rather poor (mean 41.6%, kappa 0.17). There were, however, 20 questions that at least 67% of the respondents agreed were essential to address and 12 that they agreed were not essential. No question was relevant to the treatment decisions of more than 50% of respondents, but 91 questions were relevant to at least one respondent's decision. Conclusions. Although there was enough agreement to define a core set of questions that should be addressed with most patients, each of the remaining questions was also considered essential to some people. The core set, therefore, would not be adequate to satisfy any one patient's essential information needs. Whereas most questions would be needed to cover all patients' decision needs, only some are needed for any given patient. Such variability in information needs means that the subjective standard is the only viable legal standard for judging the adequacy of provision of information for the treatment decision. Key words: information needs; informed consent; prostate cancer; patient participation; patient education. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:7-19)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 20, No. 1, 7-19 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Feldman-Stewart, M. D. Brundage, and V. Zotov
Further Insight into the Perception of Quantitative Information: Judgments of Gist in Treatment Decisions
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 34 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Brundage, D. Feldman-Stewart, A. Leis, A. Bezjak, L. Degner, K. Velji, L. Zetes-Zanatta, D. Tu, P. Ritvo, and J. Pater
Communicating Quality of Life Information to Cancer Patients: A Study of Six Presentation Formats
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 23(28): 6949 - 6956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Katz
The Sounds of Silence: Sexuality Information for Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2005; 23(1): 238 - 241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
M. A. White and M. J. Verhoef
Decision-Making Control: Why Men Decline Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Fraenkel, S. Bogardus, J. Concato, and D. Felson
Unwillingness of rheumatoid arthritis patients to risk adverse effects
Rheumatology, March 1, 2002; 41(3): 253 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N Beresford, L Seymour, C Vincent, and N Moat
Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?
Heart, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 626 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
D. Feldman-Stewart, M. D. Brundage, and W. J. Mackillop
What Questions Do Families of Patients With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Want Answered?
Journal of Family Nursing, May 1, 2001; 7(2): 188 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. J. Jager and J. L. Severens
To the Editor
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 355 - 356.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Feldman-Stewart and M. D. Brundage
In reply
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 356 - 356.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Feldman-Stewart, N. Kocovski, B. A. McConnell, M. D. Brundage, and W. J. Mackillop
Perception of Quantitative Information for Treatment Decisions
Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 228 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]