Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steyerberg, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Habbema, J.D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steyerberg, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Habbema, J.D. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Decision Analyses for Prophylactic Replacement of the Björk-Shiley Convexo-concave Heart Valve:

An Evaluation of Assumptions and Estimates

Ewout W. Steyerberg, PhD

Marjon Kallewaard, PhD

Yolanda Van Der Graaf, MD, PhD

Lex A. Van Herwerden, MD, PhD

J.Dik F. Habbema, PhD

Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (BScc) mechanical heart valves have a risk of outlet strut fracture. Decision-analytic models may support decision making regarding prophylactic replacement to avert the disastrous consequences of fracture. Assumptions and estimates from previous analyses were evaluated to develop an accurate new decision model, incorporating updated follow-up experience from 2,263 patients with BScc valves implanted between 1979 and 1985 in The Netherlands. The authors focus on estimation of fracture risks (50 events) and survival (883 deaths, excluding fractures). In previous analyses, fracture risk was estimated with widely varying combinations of patient, valve, and production characteristics. Two analyses assumed a constant fracture hazard during follow-up, while data from the present study suggest that risk decreases with increasing age during follow-up. An additive excess-risk model was applied in two analyses to estimate survival. The assumption of a constant additive excess risk was not supported by the Dutch data, which suggest that the life expectancies of patients currently alive with BScc valves may be shorter than previously believed. Based on the revised decision model, over 90% of the currently alive Dutch BScc valve patients do not benefit from replacement, since the fracture risk causes only a minor reduction of remaining life expectancy. The variation in essential assumptions of previous decision analyses directly affected the indication for prophylactic replacement. This study shows how detailed statistical analyses may guide modeling choices in a decision analysis. Key words: heart valve prosthesis; prosthesis failure; follow-up studies; life expectancy; risk factors; decision-support techniques; regression analysis; statistical models; survival analysis. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:20-32)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 20, No. 1, 20-32 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. W.A. van Geldorp, W.R. Eric Jamieson, A. P. Kappetein, J. Ye, G. J. Fradet, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. J.J.C. Bogers, and J. J.M. Takkenberg
Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: Weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. W.A. van Geldorp, W.R. E. Jamieson, A. P. Kappetein, J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. J.M. Takkenberg, and A. J.J.C. Bogers
Usefulness of microsimulation to translate valve performance into patient outcome: Patient prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier Edwards supra-annular valve
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 702 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Helfand and L. Saxton
Medical Decision Making and Electronic Publishing
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 98 - 100.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Gerosa, R. Carta, M. Montisci, L. Leoni, S. Iliceto, G. Rizzoli, and F. di Marco
How to deal with recipients of valves prone to structural failure in the 2000s: Padua experience with the TRI Technologies valve.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 858 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, L. A. van Herwerden, W.R. E. Jamieson, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers
Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 29(3): 374 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, E. W. Steyerberg, L. A. van Herwerden, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers
Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve: Use of Microsimulation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 825 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. H. Blackstone
Could It Happen Again?: The Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valve Story
Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2717 - 2719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. J. Blot, M. A. Ibrahim, T. D. Ivey, D. E. Acheson, R. Brookmeyer, A. Weyman, J. Defauw, J. K. Smith, and D. Harrison
Twenty-Five-Year Experience With the Bjork-Shiley Convexoconcave Heart Valve: A Continuing Clinical Concern
Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2850 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.J. van Gorp, E.W. Steyerberg, and Y. van der Graaf
Decision Guidelines for Prophylactic Replacement of Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valves: Impact on Clinical Practice
Circulation, May 4, 2004; 109(17): 2092 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. van Gorp, Y. van der Graaf, B. A. J. M. de Mol, C. J. G. Bakker, T. D. Witkamp, L. M. P. Ramos, and W. P. T. M. Mali
Bjork-Shiley Convexoconcave Valves: Susceptibility Artifacts at Brain MR Imaging and Mechanical Valve Fractures
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 709 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Bottio, D. Casarotto, G. Thiene, L. Caprili, A. Angelini, and G. Gerosa
Leaflet Escape in a New Bileaflet Mechanical Valve: TRI Technologies
Circulation, May 13, 2003; 107(18): 2303 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. J.M. Takkenberg, J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, and G. L. Grunkemeier
Simulation models to predict outcome after aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1372 - 1376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, L. A. van Herwerden, E. W. Steyerberg, M. M. Lane, R. C. Elkins, J.D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers
Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1482 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J.J.M. Takkenberg, J.P.A. Puvimanasinghe, L.A. van Herwerden, E.W. Steyerberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, J.D.F Habbema, and A.J.J.C. Bogers
Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses: impact on outcome of varying thromboembolic and bleeding hazards
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q27 - Q32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, and E. W. Steyerberg
Simulation techniques to support prosthetic valve choice in aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1795 - 1795.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. J.M. Takkenberg, M. J.C. Eijkemans, L. A. van Herwerden, E. W. Steyerberg, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. D. F. Habbema, and A. J.J.C. Bogers
Estimated event-free life expectancy after autograft aortic root replacement in adults
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S344 - S348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. A. Puvimanasinghe, E. W. Steyerberg, J. J. M. Takkenberg, M. J. C. Eijkemans, L. A van Herwerden, A. J. J. C. Bogers, and J. D. F. Habbema
Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthesis : Predictions Based on Meta-Analysis and Microsimulation
Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1535 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]