This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bass, E. B. Articles by Powe, N. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bass, E. B. Articles by Powe, N. R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Use of Focus Groups to Identify Concerns about Dialysis

Mollie W. Jenckes, MHSc

Nancy E. Fink, MPH

Kate A. Cagney, MA

Albert W. Wu, MD, MPH

John H. Sadler, MD

Klemens B. Meyer, MD

Andrews. Levey, MD

Neil R. Powe, MD, MPH, MBA

Background. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may have quality-of-life (QOL) concerns that are not fully appreciated by their providers. The authors con ducted focus groups with dialysis patients and dialysis professionals to determine whether this qualitative method would reveal differences between patients' and provid ers' views about: 1) domains of QOL that are affected by ESRD and dialysis; and 2) aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Methods . Separate focus group discussions were held with: 8 adult hemodialysis patients (mean age 50 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 8.5 years), 5 adult peritoneal dialysis patients (mean age 54 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 4.6 years), 8 nephrologists (mean of 12 years of dialysis practice), and 9 other health professionals involved in dialysis care (3 nurses, 2 dieti tians, 2 social workers, and 2 technicians; mean of 10 years experience in dialysis care). Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and reviewed independently by three investigators to identify and categorize distinct thoughts. Results. 1,271 dis tinct thoughts were identified and grouped into 20 related categories, which included ten QOL domains and ten aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Compared with the professionals, the patients identified one additional relevant QOL domain (10 vs 9), and one additional aspect of dialysis that affects QOL (10 vs 9), and expressed more thoughts per domain (p < 0.05), although the contents of their comments were fre quently similar. Among QOL domains, the numbers of related thoughts identified by patients and professionals, respectively, were: freedom/control (60, 89); social rela tionships (36, 11); anxiety (37, 4); role function (24, 10); energy (12, 10); body image (16, 4); sex (11, 21); mental attitude (21, 0); sleep (15, 1), and cognitive function (13, 7). Among aspects of dialysis that affect QOL, the numbers of thoughts identified by patients and professionals were: general dialysis issues (159, 105); relationships with staff (62, 110); patient education (63, 68); diet (44, 40); scheduling (57, 3); vascular or peritoneal access issues (31, 17), adaptation to dialysis (16, 14); dialysis dose (18, 8); symptoms (25, 0), and self-care (5, 24). Conclusions. Although health professionals have a good understanding of patient concerns about the effects of ESRD and dialysis, the focus group discussions revealed a breadth and depth of QOL concerns that they may not fully appreciate. Key words: focus groups; dialysis treatment; quality of life; patient perspective. (Med Decis Making 1999; 19:287-295)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 19, No. 3, 287-295 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900307


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Kee, C. C. Patterson, A. E. Wilson, J. M. McConnell, S. M. Wheeler, and J. D. Watson Judgment Analysis of Prioritization Decisions within a Dialysis Program in One United Kingdom Region Med Decis Making, April 1, 2002; 22(2): 140 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]