|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Women's Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk
How You Ask Matters
Steven Woloshin, MD, MS
Lisa M. Schwartz, MD, MS
William C. Black, MD
H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH
Background. Some studies suggest that women dramatically overestimate the risk of having breast cancer while others conclude that they underestimate it. To understand better how women perceive the chance of getting breast cancer, the authors asked women to estimate the risk in several ways. Each woman's answer was related to her actual risk. Methods. Women were randomly selected from a registry of female vet erans in New England. A mailed questionnaire asked each woman to estimate her ten-year risk of dying from breast cancer as a number out of 1,000 ("___ in 1,000" perceived risk) and whether this risk was higher than, the same as, or lower than that of an average woman her age (comparative perceived risk). The woman was also asked to compare her risk of dying from breast cancer with her risk of dying from heart disease. Risk-factor data were collected so that each woman's actual risk of breast cancer death could be estimated (actual risk). Results . 201 women had complete data. The median age of the respondents was 62 years (range 27-80), and 98% were high school graduates. Most women (98%) overestimated the "___ in 1,000" risk of breast cancer deathhalf by eightfold or more (Interquartile range, 4-36-fold overestimates). In contrast, only 10% of these women thought that they were at higher risk than an average woman their age. Most correctly thought that their risk of dying from breast cancer was lower than their risk of dying from heart disease. The women's "___ in 1,000" perceived risks of breast cancer death were unrelated to their actual risks and had no significant agreement with an external bench mark of importantly "high risk" (i.e., met risk criteria for the Tamoxifen primary pre vention trial). In contrast, the women's comparative perceptions of being at low, av erage or high risk were related to actual risks and significantly agreed with the "high risk" benchmark. Most women not at importantly "high risk" correctly classified them selves ; however, almost two thirds of "high risk" women misclassified themselves as "average or lower than average risk." Conclusions. The method used to elicit percep tions of risk matters. These women's responses to the comparative questions showed that they "knew more" about their actual risks than their open-ended numeric re sponses suggested. Key words: risk; perception; decision making; breast neoplasms. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:221-229)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 19, No. 3,
221-229 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900301

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Visvanathan, R. T. Chlebowski, P. Hurley, N. F. Col, M. Ropka, D. Collyar, M. Morrow, C. Runowicz, K. I. Pritchard, K. Hagerty, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Pharmacologic Interventions Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2009;
27(19):
3235 - 3258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Dearborn and L. D. McCullough
Perception of Risk and Knowledge of Risk Factors in Women at High Risk for Stroke
Stroke,
April 1, 2009;
40(4):
1181 - 1186.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Robb, A. Miles, J. Campbell, P. Evans, and J. Wardle
Impact of Risk Information on Perceived Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Randomized Trial
J Health Psychol,
September 1, 2008;
13(6):
744 - 753.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek
Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception
CA Cancer J Clin,
May 1, 2007;
57(3):
147 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Robb, A. Miles, and J. Wardle
Perceived Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Sources of Risk Judgments
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
April 1, 2007;
16(4):
694 - 702.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gurmankin Levy, J. Shea, S. V. Williams, A. Quistberg, and K. Armstrong
Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
October 1, 2006;
15(10):
1893 - 1898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wang, D. J. Bowen, and S. L. R. Kardia
Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics
Health Educ Behav,
October 1, 2005;
32(5):
686 - 701.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Gurmankin, M. Helweg-Larsen, K. Armstrong, S. E. Kimmel, and K. G. M. Volpp
Comparing the Standard Rating Scale and the Magnifier Scale for Assessing Risk Perceptions
Med Decis Making,
September 1, 2005;
25(5):
560 - 570.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Egger, G. R. Cutter, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, J. S. Fosse, L. Abraham, and J. G. Elmore
Mammographers' Perception of Women's Breast Cancer Risk
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2005;
25(3):
283 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Gurmankin, S. Domchek, J. Stopfer, C. Fels, and K. Armstrong
Patients' Resistance to Risk Information in Genetic Counseling for BRCA1/2
Arch Intern Med,
March 14, 2005;
165(5):
523 - 529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vahabi
Knowledge of breast cancer and screening practices
Health Education Journal,
January 1, 2005;
64(3):
218 - 228.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Bober, L. A. Hoke, R. B. Duda, M. M. Regan, and N. M. Tung
Decision-Making About Tamoxifen in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Clinical and Psychological Factors
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2004;
22(24):
4951 - 4957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Bottorff, C. Richardson, L. G. Balneaves, M. McCullum, J. A. Buxton, P. A. Ratner, and T. Hack
Unraveling women's perceptions of risk for breast cancer
Health Educ. Res.,
August 1, 2004;
19(4):
469 - 475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Robb, A. Miles, and J. Wardle
Demographic and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Perceived Risk for Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
March 1, 2004;
13(3):
366 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Scheid, M. T. Coleman, and R. M. Hamm
Do Perceptions of Risk and Quality of Life Affect Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy by Postmenopausal Women?
J Am Board Fam Med,
July 1, 2003;
16(4):
270 - 277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Chlebowski, N. Col, E. P. Winer, D. E. Collyar, S. R. Cummings, V. G. Vogel III, H. J. Burstein, A. Eisen, I. Lipkus, and D. G. Pfister
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment of Pharmacologic Interventions for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2002;
20(15):
3328 - 3343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Mulley Jr. and K. Sepucha
Making Good Decisions about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
Ann Intern Med,
July 2, 2002;
137(1):
52 - 54.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Taylor, R. A. Shelby, M. D. Schwartz, J. Ackerman, V. H. LaSalle, E. P. Gelmann, and C. McGuire
The Impact of Item Order on Ratings of Cancer Risk Perception
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2002;
11(7):
654 - 659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A J Lloyd
The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments
Qual. Saf. Health Care,
September 1, 2001;
10(90001):
i14 - 18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Bastian, I. M. Lipkus, M. N. Kuchibhatla, H. H. Weng, S. Halabi, P. D. Ryan, C. S. Skinner, and B. K. Rimer
Women's Interest in Chemoprevention for Breast Cancer
Arch Intern Med,
July 9, 2001;
161(13):
1639 - 1644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, S. Popik, C. Guerra, and P. A. Ubel
Beliefs about Breast Cancer Risk and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2000;
20(3):
308 - 313.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|