This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mossman, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mossman, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Three-way ROCs

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis traditionally has dealt with dichoto mous diagnostic tasks (e.g., determining whether a disorder is present or absent). Often, however, medical problems involve distinguishing among more than two diag nostic alternatives. This article extends ROC concepts to diagnostic enterprises with three possible outcomes. For a trichotomous decision task, one can plot a ROC surface on three-dimensional coordinates; the volume under the ROC surface (VUS) equals the probability that test values will allow a decision maker to correctly sort a trio of items containing a randomly-selected member from each of three populations. Thus, the VUS summarizes global diagnostic accuracy for trichotomous tests, just as the area under a ROC curve does for a two-alternative diagnostic task. Information gain at points on the surface can be calculated just as is done for two-dimensional ROC curves, and investigators can thus compare three-way ROCs by comparing maximum information gain on each ROC surface. Key words: receiver operating characteristic, ROC, three-way ROC, three-alternative decision task, resampling, bootstrap, infor mation. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:78-89)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 19, No. 1, 78-89 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900110


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ma and J. Huang Penalized feature selection and classification in bioinformatics Brief Bioinform, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 392 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Li and J. P. Fine ROC analysis with multiple classes and multiple tests: methodology and its application in microarray studies Biostat., July 1, 2008; 9(3): 566 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				References J. ICRU, April 1, 2008; 8(1): 57 - 62. [PDF]

				S. Ma and J. Huang Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data Bioinformatics, December 15, 2005; 21(24): 4356 - 4362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Johnson, A. J. Noga, O. Kosoy, R. S. Lanciotti, A. A. Johnson, and B. J. Biggerstaff Duplex Microsphere-Based Immunoassay for Detection of Anti-West Nile Virus and Anti-St. Louis Encephalitis Virus Immunoglobulin M Antibodies Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 2005; 12(5): 566 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Statnikov, C. F. Aliferis, I. Tsamardinos, D. Hardin, and S. Levy A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis Bioinformatics, March 1, 2005; 21(5): 631 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Heckerling Parametric Three-Way Receiver Operating Characteristic Surface Analysis Using Mathematica Med Decis Making, October 1, 2001; 21(5): 409 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Dreiseitl, L. Ohno-Machado, and M. Binder Comparing Three-class Diagnostic Tests by Three-way ROC Analysis Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]