This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weissman, J. S. Articles by Cleary, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weissman, J. S. Articles by Cleary, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Stability of Preferences for Life-sustaining Care among Persons with AIDS in the Boston Health Study

Jennifer S. Haas, MD

Floyd J. Fowler, JR., PhD

Constantine Gatsonis, PhD

Michael P. Massagli, PhD

George R. Seage, ScD

Paul Cleary, PhD

Background. Clinicians recognize the importance of eliciting patient preferences for life-sustaining care, yet little is known about the stability of those preferences for pa tients with serious disease. Objectives. To examine the stability of preferences for life- sustaining care among persons with AIDS and to assess factors associated with changes in preferences. Design. Two patient surveys and medical record reviews, administered four months apart in 1990-1991. Setting. Three health care settings in Boston. Patients. 252 of 505 eligible persons with AIDS who participated in both base line and follow-up surveys. Main outcome measures. A single question assessing de sire for cardiac resuscitation and a scale of preferences for life-extending treatment conditional on hypothetical health states. Results. Approximately one-fourth of the re spondents changed their minds about life-sustaining care during a four-month period. Of patients who initially desired cardiac resuscitation, 23% decided to forego it four months later, and of those who initially said they would decline care, 34% later said they would accept it. Of those who initially desired any of the life-extending treatments, 25% decided to forego them four months later, and of those who initially said they would decline life-extending care, 24% later said they would accept some treatment. Patients reporting changes in physical function, pain, or suicide ideation were more likely to modify their desires to be resuscitated (all p 0.05). Patients lacking an advance directive, not completing high school, or becoming more severely ill were more likely to change their preferences on the Life Extension scale (p 0.05). Patients who discussed their preferences with at least one physician were just as likely as others to change desires for cardiac resuscitation. Age, gender, race, emotional health, clinical severity, social support, and site of care were not significant correlates of change for either measure. Conclusions. Health care providers should periodically reassess preferences for life-sustaining care, particularly for patients with progressive disease, given the instability in patient preferences. However, predictors of instability may vary with how preferences are measured. In particular, changes in health status may be related to instability of preferences for certain types of treatments. Key words: life-sustaining care; patient preferences; AIDS. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:16-26)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 19, No. 1, 16-26 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Pruchno, M. J. Rovine, F. Cartwright, and M. Wilson-Genderson Stability and Change in Patient Preferences and Spouse Substituted Judgments Regarding Dialysis Continuation J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, March 1, 2008; 63(2): S81 - S91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Rohrer, S. H. Lim, and F. A. Bock Medical Condition Is Related to Treatment Preference in Cancer Patients: Implications for Quality Assessment American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, February 1, 2007; 24(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Carrese Refusal of care: patients' well-being and physicians' ethical obligations: "but doctor, I want to go home". JAMA, August 9, 2006; 296(6): 691 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Fried, A. L. Byers, W. T. Gallo, P. H. Van Ness, V. R. Towle, J. R. O'Leary, and J. A. Dubin Prospective Study of Health Status Preferences and Changes in Preferences Over Time in Older Adults. Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Saigal, B. L. Stoskopf, E. Burrows, D. L. Streiner, and P. L. Rosenbaum Stability of Maternal Preferences for Pediatric Health States in the Perinatal Period and 1 Year Later Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2003; 157(3): 261 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				APA Council of Representatives, R. K. FARBERMAN, and National Association of Social Workers Appendix American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2002; 46(3): 418 - 438. [PDF]

				R. M. Houts, W. D. Smucker, J. A. Jacobson, P. H. Ditto, and J. H. Danks Predicting Elderly Outpatients' Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules Med Decis Making, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 39 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]