Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prostate Cancer Patients' Utilities for Health States

How It Looks Depends on Where You Stand

Gretchen B. Chapman

Arthur S. Elstein

Timothy M. Kuzel

Roohollah Sharifi

Robert B. Nadler

Anita Andrews

Charles L. Bennett

Two versions of the time-tradeoff (TTO) method were compared. In the personal TTO version, 31 prostate cancer patients decided whether they personally would give up some longevity to have perfect health rather than a longer life in a state of poor health associated with prostate cancer. In the impersonal version, 28 patients compared two hypothetical friends, one of whom has perfect health but will live less time than the other who is in poor health, and decided which person they would rather be. All patients evaluated three hypothetical health states. The two TTO methods were assessed by examining 1) how well they distinguished three health states of varying degrees of dysfunction and 2) patients' willingness to trade time for quality of life. Patients using the impersonal TTO version were more likely than those using the personal version to order the three health states appropriately (68% vs 16%, p < 0.0001) and were more willing to trade off length of life for quality of life (p < 0.05). Key words: decision making; patient participation; decision theory; prostatic neoplasms. (Med Decis Making 1998; 18:278-286)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 18, No. 3, 278-286 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. J. Damschroder, T. R. Roberts, B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, and P. A. Ubel
Why People Refuse to Make Tradeoffs in Person Tradeoff Elicitations: A Matter of Perspective?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 266 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
K. E. Bremner, C. A. K. Y. Chong, G. Tomlinson, S. M. H. Alibhai, and M. D. Krahn
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. H. Goldberg
Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. B. Elkin, M. E. Cowen, D. Cahill, M. Steffel, and M. W. Kattan
Preference Assessment Method Affects Decision-Analytic Recommendations: A Prostate Cancer Treatment Example
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 504 - 510.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. McNaughton-Collins, E. Walker-Corkery, and M. J. Barry
Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction, and Economic Outcome Measures in Studies of Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment, 1990-2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 78 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. Baron, D. A. Asch, A. Fagerlin, C. Jepson, G. Loewenstein, J. Riis, M. G. Stineman, and P. A. Ubel
Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 422 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. A. Lenert, A. Sturley, and M. Rupnow
Toward Improved Methods for Measurement of Utility: Automated Repair of Errors in Elicitations
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 67 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. J. T. Jansen, J. Kievit, M. A. Nooij, and A. M. Stiggelbout
Stability of Patients' Preferences for Chemotherapy: The Impact of Experience
Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 295 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. A. Merlino, I. Bagchi, T. N. Taylor, P. Utrie, E. Chrischilles, W. Sumner II, A. Mudano, and K. G. Saag
Preferences for Fractures and Other Glucocorticoid-Associated Adverse Effects among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Med Decis Making, April 1, 2001; 21(2): 122 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Clark, N. P. Wray, and C. M. Ashton
Living With Treatment Decisions: Regrets and Quality of Life Among Men Treated for Metastatic Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2001; 19(1): 72 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
G J Tijhuis, S J T Jansen, A M Stiggelbout, A H Zwinderman, J M W Hazes, and T P M V. Vlieland
Value of the time trade off method for measuring utilities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2000; 59(11): 892 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text]