This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DeKay, M. L. Articles by Asch, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeKay, M. L. Articles by Asch, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Is the Defensive Use of Diagnostic Tests Good for Patients, or Bad?

David A. Asch, MD, MBA

Physicians sometimes order diagnostic tests to reduce the risk of malpractice liability. The authors develop an expected-utility model that links a rational physician's concerns about malpractice liability to increases in the use of diagnostic tests and use this model to assess the effects of defensive testing on patients' interests. To do so, they adapt the threshold approach to clinical decision making to incorporate the physician's inter ests, focusing on 1) the effect of the physician's expected liability risks and 2) the effect of any expected liability reduction due to diagnostic testing. Surprisingly, the mere existence of liability risks is often sufficient to widen the range of disease probabilities for which diagnostic testing is the preferred clinical strategy. If testing reduces the physician's expected liability risks, the testing range is widened further. For some dis ease probabilities, testing is preferred by the physician even though it is not in the patient's best interests. When tests are performed in such instances, utility is trans ferred from the patient to the physician and the physician's insurer. Although the de fensive use of diagnostic tests improves clinical outcomes for some patients, it worsens clinical outcomes for others. Moreover, defensive testing worsens the expected out comes of all patients whose clinical strategies are changed. Physicians should realize that defensive testing necessarily reduces the overall quality of patient care. Key words: decision analysis; decision threshold; defensive medicine; diagnostic testing; expected utility; malpractice liability. (Med Decis Making 1998;18:19-28)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 18, No. 1, 19-28 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. DeKay Physicians' Anticipated Regret and Diagnostic Testing: Comment on Hozo and Djulbegovic, 2008 Med Decis Making, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 317 - 319. [PDF]

				I. Hozo and B. Djulbegovic Will Insistence on Practicing Medicine According to Expected Utility Theory Lead to an Increase in Diagnostic Testing? Reply to DeKay's Commentary: Physicians' Anticipated Regret and Diagnostic Testing Med Decis Making, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 320 - 324. [PDF]

				J. Sidorov It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs. Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): 1079 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Sox, T. D. Koepsell, J. N. Doctor, and D. A. Christakis Pediatricians' Clinical Decision Making: Results of 2 Randomized Controlled Trials of Test Performance Characteristics Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2006; 160(5): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Neilson, K. B. Johnson, S. T. Rosenbloom, W. D. Dupont, D. Talbert, D. A. Giuse, A. Kaiser, R. A. Miller, and the Resource Utilization Committee* The Impact of Peer Management on Test-Ordering Behavior Ann Intern Med, August 3, 2004; 141(3): 196 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Sorum, J. Shim, G. Chasseigne, S. Bonnin-Scaon, J. Cogneau, and E. Mullet Why do Primary Care Physicians in the United States and France Order Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests for Asymptomatic Patients? Med Decis Making, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 301 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Bindels, A. Hasman, J. W. J. van Wersch, P. Pop, and R. A. G. Winkens The Reliability of Assessing the Appropriateness of Requested Diagnostic Tests Med Decis Making, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A.M. van Wijk, J. van der Lei, M. Mosseveld, A. M. Bohnen, and J. H. van Bemmel Assessment of Decision Support for Blood Test Ordering in Primary Care: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2001; 134(4): 274 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Pauker and S. P. Pauker Expected-utility Perspectives on Defensive Testing: Torts, Tradeoffs, and Thresholds-- Is Defensive Medicine Defensible? Med Decis Making, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 29 - 31. [PDF]

				D. K. Owens Defensive Diagnostic Testing--A Case of Stolen Utility? Med Decis Making, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 33 - 34. [PDF]

				M. L. DeKay and D. A. Asch Offensive Testing--the Balancing Act, the Evil Twin, and the Pure Play Med Decis Making, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 35 - 36. [PDF]