Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johannesson, M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Conor, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johannesson, M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Conor, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Incorporating Future Costs in Medical Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Implications for the Cost-Effectiveness of the Treatment of Hypertension

Magnus Johannesson, PhD

David Meltzer, MD, PhD

Richard M. O'Conor, PhD

It has been shown that the difference between consumption and production during life years gained should be included as a cost in cost-effectiveness analysis. In this study the authors estimate the impact of including these future costs on the cost-effective ness of the treatment of hypertension in Sweden. The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained changes little among young men and women due to the addition of future costs, but increases by about $14,000 for middle-aged men and women and about $27,000 for older men and women. When future costs are not included, the cost per QALY gained is generally lowest among older men and women, but when future costs are included, the cost per QALY gained is generally lowest among middle-aged men and women. The authors conclude that the total resource consequences of changes in mortality should be routinely considered in cost-effectiveness analyses. Key words: Cost-effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; costs; societal per spective. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:382-389)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 4, 382-389 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Lidgren, B. Jonsson, C. Rehnberg, N. Willking, and J. Bergh
Cost-effectiveness of HER2 testing and 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for early breast cancer
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 487 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P Lindgren, M Buxton, T Kahan, N R Poulter, B Dahlof, P S Sever, H Wedel, B Jonsson, and on behalf of the ASCOT trial investigators*
Economic evaluation of ASCOT-BPLA: antihypertensive treatment with an amlodipine-based regimen is cost effective compared with an atenolol-based regimen
Heart, February 1, 2008; 94(2): e4 - e4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Lindgren, J. Graff, A. G. Olsson, T. J. Pedersen, B. Jonsson, and on behalf of the IDEAL Trial Investigators
Cost-effectiveness of high-dose atorvastatin compared with regular dose simvastatin
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2007; 28(12): 1448 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. E. Lonning
Comparing cost/utility of giving an aromatase inhibitor as monotherapy for 5 years versus sequential administration following 2-3 or 5 years of tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 217 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
References
Circulation, December 17, 2002; 106(25): 3373 - 3421.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M Johannesson
At what coronary risk level is it cost-effective to initiate cholesterol lowering drug treatment in primary prevention?
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2001; 22(11): 919 - 925.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. O. Tengs, M. Yu, E. Luistro, and H. B. Bosworth
Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke A Comprehensive Review Editorial Comment : Health-Related Quality Of Life After Stroke: A Comprehensive Review
Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 964 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B Almbrand, M Johannesson, B Sjostrand, K Malmberg, and L Ryden
Cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Results from the DIGAMI study
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2000; 21(9): 733 - 739.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. C. Immergluck, W. L. Cull, A. Schwartz, and A. S. Elstein
Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Compared With Voluntary Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Among Pregnant Women in Chicago
Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 54e - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Meltzer and M. Johannesson
Inconsistencies in the "Societal Perspective" on Costs of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 371 - 377.
[Abstract] [PDF]