This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cher, D. J. Articles by Lenert, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cher, D. J. Articles by Lenert, L. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Incorporating Risk Attitude into Markov-process Decision Models:

Importance for Individual Decision Making

John Miyamoto, PhD

Leslie A. Lenert, MD, MS

Most decision models published in the medical literature take a risk-neutral perspective. Under risk neutrality, the utility of a gamble is equivalent to its expected value and the marginal utility of living a given unit of time is the same regardless of when it occurs. Most patients, however, are not risk-neutral. Not only does risk aversion affect decision analyses when tradeoffs between short- and long-term survival are involved, it also affects the interpretation of time-tradeoff measures of health-state utility. The proportional time tradeoff under- or overestimates the disutility of an inferior health state, depending on whether the patient is risk-seeking or risk-averse (it is unbiased if the patient is risk-neutral). The authors review how risk attitude with respect to gambles for survival duration can be incorporated into decision models using the framework of risk-adjusted quality-adjusted life years (RA-QALYs). They present a simple extension of this framework that allows RA-QALYs to be calculated for Markov-process decision models. Using a previously published Markov-process model of surgical vs expectant treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), they show how attitude towards risk affects the expected number of QALYs calculated by the model. In this model, under risk neutrality, surgery was the preferred option. Under mild risk aversion, expectant treatment was the preferred option. Risk attitude is an important aspect of preferences that should be incorporated into decision models where one treatment option has up-front risks of morbidity or mortality. Key words : risk attitude; Markov models; patient preferences; quality-adjusted life years. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:340-350)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 3, 340-350 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700311


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Bleichrodt, J. M. Abellan-Perpinan, J. L. Pinto-Prades, and I. Mendez-Martinez Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility Management Science, March 1, 2007; 53(3): 469 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. B. Rosen, J. S. Tsai, and S. M. Downs Variations in Risk Attitude across Race, Gender, and Education Med Decis Making, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I Pell, J Dowie, A Clarke, A Kennedy, and V Bhavnani Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 32 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L Kravitz and J. Melnikow Engaging patients in medical decision making BMJ, September 15, 2001; 323(7313): 584 - 585. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Bayoumi and D. A. Redelmeier Decision Analysis with Cumulative Prospect Theory Med Decis Making, October 1, 2000; 20(4): 404 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Chapman Risk Attitude and Time Discounting Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 355 - 356. [PDF]