This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Street, R. L. Articles by Voigt, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Street, R. L., JR Articles by Voigt, B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Patient Participation in Deciding Breast Cancer Treatment and Subsequent Quality of Life

Becky Voigt, BSN

This investigation of patients with early breast cancer examined relationships among patient involvement in deciding treatment (i.e., whether to undergo breast removal or breast conservation), perceptions of control over treatment decisions, and subsequent health-related quality of life. It was predicted 1) that patients who more actively participated in consultations to decide treatment would perceive more decision control than would more passive patients and 2) that patients who perceived greater decision control would report better health-related quality of life following treatment than would patients perceiving less decision control. Sixty patients with stage I or II breast cancer allowed their consultations with surgeons to be audiorecorded. Following these visits, patients reported on their involvement in the consultation, optimism for the future, knowledge about treatment, and two aspects of perceived decision control, the perception of having a choice for treatment and the extent to which the doctor or patient was responsible for the decision. Six and 12 months postoperatively, 51 patients (85%) returned a follow-up survey assessing perceived decision control and health-related quality of life. The first prediction received some support. The patients who had more actively participated in their consultations, particularly in terms of offering opinions, assumed more responsibility for treatment decisions during the year following surgery than did less expressive patients. Also, the patients who reported more involvement in their consultations later believed they had had more of a choice for treatment. The second hypothesis was partially supported. Six and 12 months following treatment, the patients who believed they were more responsible for treatment decisions and believed they had more choice of treatment reported higher levels of quality of life than did the patients who perceived themselves to have less decision control. However, perceived control at the time of treatment did not predict later quality of life. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. Key words : decision control; patient participation; breast cancer; health-related quality of life. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:298-306)

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Stacey, R. Samant, and C. Bennett Decision Making in Oncology: A Review of Patient Decision Aids to Support Patient Participation CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2008; 58(5): 293 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Barnato, H. A. Llewellyn-Thomas, E. M. Peters, L. Siminoff, E. D. Collins, and M. J. Barry Communication and Decision Making in Cancer Care: Setting Research Priorities for Decision Support/Patients' Decision Aids Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 626 - 634. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mandelblatt, B. Kreling, M. Figeuriedo, and S. Feng What Is the Impact of Shared Decision Making on Treatment and Outcomes for Older Women With Breast Cancer? J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2006; 24(30): 4908 - 4913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. J. Thijssens, J. E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers, R. J. van Ginkel, and H. J. Hoekstra Quality of Life After Hyperthermic Isolated Limb Perfusion for Locally Advanced Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 864 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Wolpin, B. A. Chabner, T. J. Lynch Jr., and R. T. Penson Learning to Cope: How Far Is Too Close? Oncologist, June 1, 2005; 10(6): 449 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hwang Attitudes of Persons With Physical Disabilities Toward Physician-Assisted Death: An Exploratory Assessment of the Vulnerability Argument Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2005; 16(1): 16 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Butow, R. Devine, M. Boyer, S. Pendlebury, M. Jackson, and M. H.N. Tattersall Cancer Consultation Preparation Package: Changing Patients but Not Physicians Is Not Enough J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 22(21): 4401 - 4409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. B. Leighl, P. N. Butow, and M. H.N. Tattersall Treatment Decision Aids in Advanced Cancer: When the Goal Is Not Cure and the Answer Is Not Clear J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 22(9): 1759 - 1762. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Haidet and D. A. Paterniti "Building" a History Rather Than "Taking" One: A Perspective on Information Sharing During the Medical Interview Arch Intern Med, May 26, 2003; 163(10): 1134 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Molenaar, M. A. Sprangers, E. J. Th. Rutgers, E. J. Luiten, J. Mulder, P. M. Bossuyt, J. J. van Everdingen, P. Oosterveld, and H. C. de Haes Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2001; 19(6): 1676 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Leighl, M. Gattellari, P. Butow, R. Brown, and M. H.N. Tattersall Discussing Adjuvant Cancer Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2001; 19(6): 1768 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Edwards and G. Elwyn How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged?: A Review of the Literature Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Edwards and G. Elwyn The Potential Benefits of Decision Aids in Clinical Medicine JAMA, August 25, 1999; 282(8): 779 - 780. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F.M. Stalmeier, I. J. Unic, L. C.G. Verhoef, and W. A.J. Van Daal Evaluation of a Shared Decision Making Program for Women Suspected to Have a Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 230 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. C.J.M. De Haes and S. Molenaar Patient Participation and Decision Control: Are Patient Autonomy and Well-being Associated? Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 353 - 354. [PDF]