|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Use of Influence Diagrams to Structure Medical Decisions
Robert F. Nease, JR, PhD
Douglas K. Owens, MD, MSc
Influence diagrams are compact representations of decision problems that are mathematically equivalent to decision trees. The authors present five important principles for structuring a decision as an influence diagram: 1) start at the value node and work back to the decision nodes; 2) draw the arcs in the direction that makes the probabilities easiest to assess; 3) use informational arcs to specify which events will have been observed at the time each decision is made; 4) ensure that missing arcs reflect intentional assertions about conditional independence and the timing of observations; and 5) ensure that there are no cycles in the influence diagram. They then build an influence diagram for the problem of staging non-small-cell lung cancer as an illustration. Influence diagrams offer several strengths for structuring medical decisions. They represent graphically and compactly the probabilistic relationships between parameters in the model. Influence diagrams also allow the model to be structured in a fashion that eases the necessary probability assessments, regardless of whether the assessments are based on available evidence or on expert judgment. Influence diagrams provide an important complement to decision trees, especially for representing probabilistic relationships among variables in a decision model. Key words : decision analysis; influence diagrams; decision tree; decision techniques; cost-effectiveness analysis. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:263-275)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 3,
263-275 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700302
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Gomez, C. Bielza, J. A. Fernandez del Pozo, and S. Rios-Insua
A Graphical Decision-Theoretic Model for Neonatal Jaundice
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2007;
27(3):
250 - 265.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Lee, E. Ekaette, K.-L. Kelly, P. Craighead, C. Newcomb, and P. Dunscombe
Implications of Cancer Staging Uncertainties in Radiation Therapy Decisions
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2006;
26(3):
226 - 238.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Pauker and J. B. Wong
The Influence of Influence Diagrams in Medicine
Decision Analysis,
December 1, 2005;
2(4):
238 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Bravata, K. M. McDonald, H. Szeto, W. M. Smith, C. Rydzak, and D. K. Owens
A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Information Technologies and Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2004;
24(2):
192 - 206.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K. Owens
Analytic Tools for Public Health Decision Making
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2002;
22(5_suppl):
S3 - S10.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Sanders, R. F. Nease JR, and D. K. Owens
Design and Pilot Evaluation of a System to Develop Computer-based Site-specific Practice Guidelines from Decision Models
Med Decis Making,
April 1, 2000;
20(2):
145 - 159.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. P. Lehmann, R. Hinton, P. Morello, J. Santoli, in conjunction with the Committee on Quality Impro, and Subcommittee on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Practice Guideline: Technical Report
Pediatrics,
April 1, 2000;
105(4):
57e - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K. Owens, R. D. Shachter, and R. F. Nease JR
Representation and Analysis of Medical Decision Problems with Influence Diagrams
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 1997;
17(3):
241 - 262.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Helfand and S. G. Pauker
Influence Diagrams:: A New Dimension for Decision Models
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 1997;
17(3):
351 - 352.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
