This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bleichrodt, H. Articles by Johannesson, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bleichrodt, H. Articles by Johannesson, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Experimental Test of a Theoretical Foundation for Rating-scale Valuations

Magnus Johannesson, PhD

A major advantage of using a rating scale in health-utility measurement is its practical applicability: the method is relatively easy to understand, and various health states can be assessed simultaneously. However, a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations has not been established. The primary aim of this paper is to present a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations based on the theory of measurable value functions and to provide a consistency test to see whether rating-scale valuations do indeed elicit a measurable value function. If rating-scale valuations elicit a measurable value function, then Dyer and Sarin have shown how they are related to von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) utilities. The appropriate technique to measure vNM utilities is the standard gamble. Torrance has suggested that rating-scale valuations and standard-gamble valuations are related by a power function. A secondary aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between rating-scale valuations and standard-gamble valuations hypothesized by Torrance. An experiment was designed to test consistency of rating-scale valuations and the relationship between rating-scale valuations and standard-gamble valuations. The experiment tested whether rating-scale valuations are independent of the context in which they are elicited, as they should be if they elicit points on a measurable value function. 80 Swedish and 92 Dutch respondents participated in the experiment. The results showed that rating-scale valuations depend on the number of preferred alternatives in the task and thus violate a basic property of measurable value functions. The estimation of the power function did not result in stable results: parameter estimates varied, in some cases there was indication of misspecification, and in most cases there was indication of heteroskedastic errors. The implications of these findings for the common use of rating-scale valuations in cost-utility analysis are serious: the dependency of the rating-scale valuations on the other health states included in the task casts serious doubts on the validity of the rating-scale method. Key words: QALYs; rating scale; cost-utility analysis; medical decision making. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:208-216))

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 2, 208-216 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700212


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Bravo Vergel and M. Sculpher Quality-adjusted life years Practical Neurology, June 1, 2008; 8(3): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. McFarlane, A. Pierratos, A. M. Bayoumi, and D. A. Redelmeier Estimating Preference Scores in Conventional and Home Nocturnal Hemodialysis Patients Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Swan, W. F. Lawrence, and J. Roy Process Utility in Breast Biopsy Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 347 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.-R. Lin, H.-F. Hwang, K.-P. Chung, C. Huang, and C.-Y. Chen Rating Scale, Standard Gamble, and Time Trade-off for People With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries Physical Therapy, March 1, 2006; 86(3): 337 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Mrus, M. S. Yi, K. A. Freedberg, A. W. Wu, R. Zackin, H. Gorski, and J. Tsevat Utilities Derived from Visual Analog Scale Scores in Patients with HIV/AIDS Med Decis Making, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 414 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. W. Torrance, D. Feeny, and W. Furlong Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States? Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Robinson, G. Loomes, and M. Jones-Lee Visual Analog Scales, Standard Gambles, and Relative Risk Aversion Med Decis Making, February 1, 2001; 21(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Postulart and E. M.M. Adang Response Shift and Adaptation in Chronically III Patients Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Lundberg, M. Johannesson, D. G.L. Isacson, and L. Borgquist The Relationship between Health-state Utilities and the SF-12 in a General Population Med Decis Making, April 1, 1999; 19(2): 128 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]