This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Orr, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Orr, R. K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Use of a Probabilistic Neural Network to Estimate the Risk of Mortality after Cardiac Surgery

Objective. To develop a probabilistic neural network (PNN) to estimate mortality risk following cardiac surgery. Design and setting. The PNN model was created using an institutional database obtained as part of routine quality assurance activity. Patient records (from 1991 to 1993) were randomly divided into training (n = 732) and validation (n = 380) sets. The model uses seven variables, each obtainable during routine clinical patient care. After completion of the initial validation phase, newer data (1994) became available and were used as an independent source of validation (n = 365). Patients. 1,477 consecutive cardiac surgery patients operated on in a teaching hospital during a four-year period (1991-94). Results. The overall accuracy of the neural network was 91.5% in the training set; it was 92.3% in the validation set. The model was well calibrated (p = 0.21 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) and discriminated well (areas under the ROC curves were 0.72 and 0.81 for the training and validation sets). The trained network also performed well on the 1994 data (ROC = 0.74, p = 0.19 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test), albeit with a slight decrement in overall accuracy (88.2%). Conclusion. A neural network may be implemented to estimate mortality risk following cardiac surgery. Implementation is relatively rapid, and it is an alternative to standard statistical approaches. Key words: neural networks; cardiac surgery; predictive models. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:178-185)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 2, 178-185 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. A. Ferraris, F. H. Edwards, D. M. Shahian, and S. P. Ferraris Risk Stratification and Comorbidity Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 199 - 246. [Full Text]

				J. Nilsson, M. Ohlsson, L. Thulin, P. Hoglund, S. A.M. Nashef, and J. Brandt Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Shahian, E. H. Blackstone, F. H. Edwards, F. L. Grover, G. L. Grunkemeier, D. C. Naftel, S. A.M. Nashef, W. C. Nugent, and E. D. Peterson Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position Article Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1868 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. W. Steyerberg, M. J. C. Eijkemans, F. E. Harrell Jr, and J. D. F. Habbema Prognostic Modeling with Logistic Regression Analysis: In Search of a Sensible Strategy in Small Data Sets Med Decis Making, February 1, 2001; 21(1): 45 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]