| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Can Preference Scores for Discrete States Be Used to Derive Preference Scores for an Entire Path of Events?An Application to Prenatal Diagnosis
The authors conducted a study exploring whether preferences for sequences of events can be approximated by preferences for component discrete states. Visual-analog- scale (VAS) and standard-gamble (SG) scores for a subset of the possible sequences of events (path states) and component temporary and chronic outcomes (discrete states) that can follow prenatal diagnostic decisions were elicited from 121 pregnant women facing a choice between chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. For in dividuals, preference scores for path states could not be predicted easily from discrete- state scores. Mean path-state VAS scores, however, were predicted reasonably ac curately by multiple regression models (R2 = 0.85 and 0.82 for two different anchoring schemes), with most measured scores lying within the 95% confidence intervals of the derived scores. It is concluded that, for individual patient decision making, preferences for path states should be elicited. When mean preference values for a population are sought, however, it may be reasonable to derive regression weights from a subset of respondents and then to apply those weights to preferences for discrete states elicited from a larger group. Key words: utility measurement; patient preferences; multiple re gression ; standard gamble; visual analog scaling; prenatal diagnosis. (Med Decis Mak ing 1997;17:42-55))
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 1,
42-55 (1997) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
