This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bleichrodt, H. Articles by Johannesson, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bleichrodt, H. Articles by Johannesson, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Validity of QALYs

An Experimental Test of Constant Proportional Tradeoff and Utility Independence

Magnus Johannesson

Pliskin, Shepard, and Weinstein identified three preference conditions that ensure that quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) represent preferences over gambles over chronic health profiles. This paper presents an experimental test of the descriptive validity of two of these preference assumptions: utility independence and constant proportional tradeoff. Eighty students at the Stockholm School of Economics and 92 students at Erasmus University Rotterdam participated in the experiment. The results of the ex periment support the descriptive validity of constant proportional tradeoff: both within groups and between groups constant proportional tradeoff could not be rejected. The results are less supportive of the descriptive validity of utility independence. Within- groups utility independence was rejected. Between-groups utility independence could not be rejected, but this may have been due to a lack of statistical power. Analysis of the individual responses revealed that without adjustment for imprecision of preference, 39 respondents (22.8%) satisfied constant proportional tradeoff. Twenty-three respon dents (13.4%) satisfied utility independence without adjustment for imprecision of pref erence. However, because of the relative unfamiliarity of the respondents with both the health states to be evaluated and the methods of health-state-utility measurement, it is likely that the respondents' preferences were imprecise. Adjusted for imprecision of preference, the upper estimates of the proportions of respondents who satisfied constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence, respectively, were 90.1% (155 respondents) and 75.6% (130 respondents). Pliskin et al. further derived that if an individual's preferences satisfy both constant proportional tradeoff and utility indepen dence, then these preferences can be represented by a more general, risk-adjusted QALY model. Without adjustment for imprecision of preference, ten respondents (5.8%) satisfied both constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence. Adjusted for imprecision of preference, the upper estimate of the proportion of respondents who satisfied both constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence was 68.6% (118 respondents). The results of this study indicate that constant proportional tradeoff holds approximately. The evidence is much weaker for utility independence, however. This has important implications for the use of QALY-type measures in medical decision making. Key words: QALYs; health utility measurements; medical decision making; individual preferences. (Med Decis Making 1996;17:21-32)

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. Janssen, E. Birnie, and G. Bonsel Feasibility and Reliability of the Annual Profile Method for Deriving QALYs for Short-Term Health Conditions Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 500 - 510. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. McFarlane, A. Pierratos, A. M. Bayoumi, and D. A. Redelmeier Estimating Preference Scores in Conventional and Home Nocturnal Hemodialysis Patients Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tsuchiya and P. Dolan The QALY Model and Individual Preferences for Health States and Health Profiles over Time: A Systematic Review of the Literature Med Decis Making, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. D. Mackeigan, B. J. O'Brien, and P. I. Oh Holistic versus Composite Preferences for Lifetime Treatment Sequences for Type 2 Diabetes Med Decis Making, April 1, 1999; 19(2): 113 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Unic, P. F.M. Stalmeier, L. C.G. Verhoef, and W. A.J. Van Daal Assessment of the Time-tradeoff Val ues for Prophylactic Mastectomy of Women with a Suspected Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer Med Decis Making, August 1, 1998; 18(3): 268 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Nease JR and D. K. Owens Use of Influence Diagrams to Structure Medical Decisions Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 263 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]