This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Phelps, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Phelps, C. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Good Technologies Gone Bad

How and Why the Cost-Effectiveness of a Medical Intervention Changes for Different Populations

Cost-effectiveness (CE) ratios vary considerably, not only across interventions, but within single interventions. Using a simple decision-tree model of the treat-vs no-treat decision to organize the analysis, four potential errors leading to these within-treatment differences in CE ratios are identified. These errors arise from estimates relating to 1) prior probabilities of disease; 2) treatment efficacies; 3) costs of treatment; and 4) patient preferences. Systematic biases, where present, suggest overuse of medical interventions. For diagnostic tests, two additional potential sources of error are con sidered (using a simple decision tree incorporating both test and treat decisions). These involve 5) sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test and 6) inappropriate choice of "cutoff" to determine abnormal patients, in part arising from errors in esti mating prior probability of disease. Key words: cost-effectiveness; biases; errors; re source use; utilities. (Med Decis Making 1997;17:107-117)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 17, No. 1, 107-117 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700113


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?