This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iezzoni, L. I. Articles by Mackiernan, Y. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iezzoni, L. I. Articles by Mackiernan, Y. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Predicting In-hospital Mortality for Stroke Patients

Results Differ across Severity-measurement Methods

Michael Shwartz, PhD

Arlene S. Ash, PhD

Yevgenia D. Mackiernan

Objective: To see whether severity-adjusted predictions of likelihoods of in-hospital death for stroke patients differed among severity measures. Methods: The study sam ple was 9,407 stroke patients from 94 hospitals, with 916 (9.7%) in-hospital deaths. Probability of death was calculated for each patient using logistic regression with age-sex and each of five severity measures as the independent variables: admission MedisGroups probability-of-death scores; scores based on 17 physiologic variables on admission; Disease Staging's probability-of-mortality model; the Severity Score of Pa tient Management Categones (PMCs); and the All Patient-Refined Diagnosis Groups (APR-DRGs). For each patient, the odds of death predicted by the severity measures were compared. The frequencies of seven clinical indicators of poor prognosis in stroke were examined for patients with very different odds of death predicted by different severity measures. Odds ratios were considered very different when the odds of death predicted by one severity measure was less than 0.5 or greater than 2.0 of that pre dicted by a second measure. Results: MedisGroups and the physiology scores pre dicted similar odds of death for 82.2% of the patients. MedisGroups and PMCs disa greed the most, with very different odds predicted for 61.6% of patients. Patients viewed as more severely ill by MedisGroups and the physiology score were more likely to have the clinical stroke findings than were patients seen as sicker by the other severity measures. This suggests that MedisGroups and the physiology score are more clinically credible. Conclusions: Some pairs of severity measures ranked over 60% of patients very differently by predicted probability of death. Studies of seventy-adjusted stroke outcomes may produce different results depending on which seventy measure is used for risk adjustment. Key words: seventy; risk adjustment; stroke; in-hospital deaths; mortality rates. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:348-356)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 4, 348-356 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600405


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kelly, J. P. Thompson, D. Tuttle, C. Benesch, and R. G. Holloway Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke: Is It Measuring Quality? Stroke, December 1, 2008; 39(12): 3367 - 3371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. O. Odetola, A. Gebremariam, and G. L. Freed Patient and Hospital Correlates of Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Severe Pediatric Sepsis Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 487 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Shen and E. L. Washington Disparities in Outcomes Among Patients With Stroke Associated With Insurance Status Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 1010 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Austin, D. A. Alter, and J. V. Tu The Use of Fixed-and Random-Effects Models for Classifying Hospitals as Mortality Outliers: A Monte Carlo Assessment Med Decis Making, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 526 - 539. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Austin A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Profiling Hospital Performance Med Decis Making, April 1, 2002; 22(2): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. R. Williams and J. G. Jiang Development of an Ischemic Stroke Survival Score Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2414 - 2420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Poses, D. K. McClish, W. R. Smith, E. C. Huber, F. L. W. Clemo, B. P. Schmitt, D. Alexander, E. M. Racht, and C. C. Colenda III Results of Report Cards for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure Depend on the Method Used To Adjust for Severity Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2000; 133(1): 10 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. A. Wolfe, K. Tilling, R. Beech, and A. G. Rudd Variations in Case Fatality and Dependency From Stroke in Western and Central Europe Stroke, February 1, 1999; 30(2): 350 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. I. lezzoni The Risks of Risk Adjustment JAMA, November 19, 1997; 278(19): 1600 - 1607. [Abstract] [PDF]