Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iezzoni, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mackiernan, Y. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iezzoni, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Mackiernan, Y. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 4, 348-356 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600405

Predicting In-hospital Mortality for Stroke Patients

Results Differ across Severity-measurement Methods

Lisa I. Iezzoni, MD, MSc

Michael Shwartz, PhD

Arlene S. Ash, PhD

Yevgenia D. Mackiernan

Objective: To see whether severity-adjusted predictions of likelihoods of in-hospital death for stroke patients differed among severity measures. Methods: The study sam ple was 9,407 stroke patients from 94 hospitals, with 916 (9.7%) in-hospital deaths. Probability of death was calculated for each patient using logistic regression with age-sex and each of five severity measures as the independent variables: admission MedisGroups probability-of-death scores; scores based on 17 physiologic variables on admission; Disease Staging's probability-of-mortality model; the Severity Score of Pa tient Management Categones (PMCs); and the All Patient-Refined Diagnosis Groups (APR-DRGs). For each patient, the odds of death predicted by the severity measures were compared. The frequencies of seven clinical indicators of poor prognosis in stroke were examined for patients with very different odds of death predicted by different severity measures. Odds ratios were considered very different when the odds of death predicted by one severity measure was less than 0.5 or greater than 2.0 of that pre dicted by a second measure. Results: MedisGroups and the physiology scores pre dicted similar odds of death for 82.2% of the patients. MedisGroups and PMCs disa greed the most, with very different odds predicted for 61.6% of patients. Patients viewed as more severely ill by MedisGroups and the physiology score were more likely to have the clinical stroke findings than were patients seen as sicker by the other severity measures. This suggests that MedisGroups and the physiology score are more clinically credible. Conclusions: Some pairs of severity measures ranked over 60% of patients very differently by predicted probability of death. Studies of seventy-adjusted stroke outcomes may produce different results depending on which seventy measure is used for risk adjustment. Key words: seventy; risk adjustment; stroke; in-hospital deaths; mortality rates. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:348-356)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. O. Odetola, A. Gebremariam, and G. L. Freed
Patient and Hospital Correlates of Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Severe Pediatric Sepsis
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. J. Shen and E. L. Washington
Disparities in Outcomes Among Patients With Stroke Associated With Insurance Status
Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 1010 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. C. Austin, D. A. Alter, and J. V. Tu
The Use of Fixed-and Random-Effects Models for Classifying Hospitals as Mortality Outliers: A Monte Carlo Assessment
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 526 - 539.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. R. Williams and J. G. Jiang
Development of an Ischemic Stroke Survival Score
Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2414 - 2420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. M. Poses, D. K. McClish, W. R. Smith, E. C. Huber, F. L. W. Clemo, B. P. Schmitt, D. Alexander, E. M. Racht, and C. C. Colenda III
Results of Report Cards for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure Depend on the Method Used To Adjust for Severity
Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2000; 133(1): 10 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. D. A. Wolfe, K. Tilling, R. Beech, and A. G. Rudd
Variations in Case Fatality and Dependency From Stroke in Western and Central Europe
Stroke, February 1, 1999; 30(2): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]