Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durand-Zaleski, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rostoker, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durand-Zaleski, I.
Right arrow Articles by Rostoker, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Cost Analysis of the Prevention of End-stage Renal Disease

Immunoglobulin Therapy for IgA Nephropathy

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, MD, PhD

Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, MD

Stéphane Zaleski, PhD

Bertrand Weil, MD

Guy Rostoker, MD, PhD

A cost analysis was used to evaluate three possible immunoglobulin (IgG) treatment protocols for end-stage renal disease due to IgA nephropathy. The perspective chosen for the cost analysis was that of the health-care delivery system. The baseline strategy was the absence of IgG treatment, and alternative strategies corresponded to three protocols presently on trial: all three included a high initial dose of intravenous IgG. Protocol 1 followed with intramuscular IgG injections only, protocol 2 with intramuscular plus intravenous injections, and protocol 3 with intravenous injections only. The costs of treatment included the costs of immunoglobulins, outpatient hospital costs, and the costs of tests; the savings (costs averted) resulted from kidney dialysis averted. The bottom line for the health-care system is a net savings of $233,000, $213,000, or $83,000, depending on the protocol chosen. The computation of costs did not value physical and psychological health benefits. Thus, any subjective benefit, such as im proved comfort, or objective benefit, such as longer life expectancy, would be an im provement over the results presented here. Key words: cost analysis; end-stage renal disease; treatment protocols. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:326-334)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 4, 326-334 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
F. A. Sonnenberg
Immunoglobulin Therapy for IgA Nephropathy: When Is Cost Saving Enough?
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1996; 16(4): 420 - 421.
[PDF]