This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brickley, M. R. Articles by Shepherd, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brickley, M. R. Articles by Shepherd, J. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Performance of a Neural Network Trained to Make Third-molar Treatment-planning Decisions

Jonathan P. Shepherd, PhD, MSc, BDS

The authors developed and tested 12 neural networks of different architectures to make lower-third-molar treatment-planning decisions, using a software-based neural network (Neudesk 1.2, Neural Computer Sciences, Southampton, UK). Network train ing was undertaken using clinical histories from 119 patients (with 238 lower third molars) referred for treatment planning (79 females and 40 males, mean age 25 years) together with output data consisting of actual treatments planned by a senior oral surgeon. Both the input clinical data and the consultant decisions were treated on a tooth-wise basis and were coded to numerical values. Binary data (e.g., present/ab sent) were coded to 1 and 0, while quantitative data (e.g., age) were scaled to fall between 0 and 1. A network based on the optimal architecture was trained and then interrogated with test data derived from a further 174 patients (119 females and 55 males, mean age 26 years) with 348 lower third molars. Network decisions were di chotomized with a threshold of 0.8. With no knowledge of the network decisions, the senior oral surgeon indicated his preferred treatments. The teeth were then assigned to "gold-standard" categories of indications present or absent based on National In stitutes of Health consensus criteria. Against this, the network achieved a sensitivity of 0.78, which was slightly inferior to that of the oral surgeon (0.88), although this difference was not significant, and a specificity of 0.98, compared with 0.99 for the oral surgeon (p = NS). Agreement between the oral surgeon and network decisions was very high (kappa = 0.850). This study demonstrates that it is possible to train a neural network to provide reliable decision support for lower-third-molar treatment planning. Key words: Decision support; neural network; third molars. (Med Decis Making 1996; 16:153-160)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 2, 153-160 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Mendonca Clinical Decision Support Systems: Perspectives in Dentistry J Dent Educ., June 1, 2004; 68(6): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.A. Gansky Dental Data Mining: Potential Pitfalls and Practical Issues Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 2003; 17(1): 109 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gottschalk, M. C. Hyzer, and R. T. Geer A Comparison of Human and Machine-based Predictions of Successful Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Med Decis Making, April 1, 2000; 20(2): 160 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Effectiveness Matters: Prophylactic Removal of Impacted Third Molars: Is It Justified? J. Orthod., June 1, 1999; 26(2): 149 - 151. [Full Text] [PDF]