|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Decisions
The Satisfaction with Decision Scale
Margaret Holmes-Rovner, PhD
Jill Kroll, PhD
Neal Schmitt, PhD
David R. Rovner, MD
M. Lynn Breer, MA
Marilyn L. Rothert, PhD, RN, FAAN
Georgia Padonu, PhD, RN
Geraldine Talarczyk, EdD, RN
Patient satisfaction measures have previously addressed satisfaction with medical care, satisfaction with providers, and satisfaction with outcomes, but not satisfaction with the health care decision itself. As patients become more involved in health care decisions, it is important to understand specific dynamics of the decision itself The Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) scale measures satisfaction with health care decisions. It was developed in the context of postmenopausal hormone-replacement therapy decisions The six-item scale has excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Discriminant validity, tested by performing principal- components analysis of items pooled from the SWD scale and two conceptually related measures, was good. Correlation of the SWD scale with measures of satisfaction with other aspects of the decision-making process showed the SWD scale was correlated most highly (0.64) with "decisional confidence," and least with "desire to participate in health care de cisions" and "satisfaction with provider " The SWD scale predicts decision certainty in this study. Use in an independent study showed that the SWD scale was correlated with the likelihood of patients' intentions to get a flu shot. Further investigation in relation to other health decisions will establish the utility of the SWD scale as an outcome measure Key words: patient satisfaction; medical decision making; decision support (Med Decis Making 1996;16:58-64)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 16, No. 1,
58-64 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600114

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Dy
Instruments for Evaluating Shared Medical Decision Making: A Structured Literature Review
Med Care Res Rev,
December 1, 2007;
64(6):
623 - 649.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Elkin, S. H.M. Kim, E. S. Casper, D. W. Kissane, and D. Schrag
Desire for Information and Involvement in Treatment Decisions: Elderly Cancer Patients' Preferences and Their Physicians' Perceptions
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2007;
25(33):
5275 - 5280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A Montgomery, C. L Emmett, T. Fahey, C. Jones, I. Ricketts, R. R Patel, T. J Peters, D. J Murphy, and DiAMOND Study Group
Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial
BMJ,
June 23, 2007;
334(7607):
1305 - 1305.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Hamilton, D. Russell, C. Stabb, D. Seamark, C. Campion-Smith, and N. Britten
The effect of patient self-completion agenda forms on prescribing and adherence in general practice: a randomized controlled trial
Fam. Pract.,
February 1, 2007;
24(1):
77 - 83.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Wilkins, J. C. Lowery, L. A. Copeland, S. L. Goldfarb, P. A. Wren, and N. K. Janz
Impact of an Educational Video on Patient Decision Making in Early Breast Cancer Treatment
Med Decis Making,
November 1, 2006;
26(6):
589 - 598.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, B. Weber, P. A. Ubel, N. Peters, J. Holmes, and J. S. Schwartz
Individualized Survival Curves Improve Satisfaction With Cancer Risk Management Decisions in Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2005;
23(36):
9319 - 9328.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Lin, B.-O Lee, and F. D. Hicks
The Phenomenology of Deciding About Hemodialysis Among Taiwanese
West J Nurs Res,
November 1, 2005;
27(7):
915 - 929.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V.L. Peddie, E. van Teijlingen, and S. Bhattacharya
A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod.,
July 1, 2005;
20(7):
1944 - 1951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Bober, L. A. Hoke, R. B. Duda, M. M. Regan, and N. M. Tung
Decision-Making About Tamoxifen in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Clinical and Psychological Factors
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2004;
22(24):
4951 - 4957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. K. Janz, P. A. Wren, L. A. Copeland, J. C. Lowery, S. L. Goldfarb, and E. G. Wilkins
Patient-Physician Concordance: Preferences, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Breast Cancer Surgical Decision
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 1, 2004;
22(15):
3091 - 3098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Green, S. K. Peterson, M. W. Baker, G. R. Harper, L. C. Friedman, W. S. Rubinstein, and D. T. Mauger
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA,
July 28, 2004;
292(4):
442 - 452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Taylor, R. Shelby, E. Gelmann, and C. McGuire
Quality of Life and Trial Adherence Among Participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst,
July 21, 2004;
96(14):
1083 - 1094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Simon, L. A. Siminoff, E. D. Kodish, and C. Burant
Comparison of the Informed Consent Process for Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric and Adult Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol.,
July 1, 2004;
22(13):
2708 - 2717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Edwards, S. Unigwe, G. Elwyn, and K. Hood
Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review
BMJ,
September 27, 2003;
327(7417):
703 - 709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Simon, S. J. Zyzanski, M. Eder, P. Raiz, E. D. Kodish, and L. A. Siminoff
Groups Potentially at Risk for Making Poorly Informed Decisions About Entry into Clinical Trials for Childhood Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2003;
21(11):
2173 - 2178.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Volk, S. J. Spann, A. R. Cass, and S. T. Hawley
Patient Education for Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up
Ann. Fam. Med,
May 1, 2003;
1(1):
22 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Thomson, A. Robinson, J. Greenaway, and P. Lowe
Development and description of a decision analysis based decision support tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
Qual. Saf. Health Care,
March 1, 2002;
11(1):
25 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Barry
Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice
Ann Intern Med,
January 15, 2002;
136(2):
127 - 135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Clark, N. P. Wray, and C. M. Ashton
Living With Treatment Decisions: Regrets and Quality of Life Among Men Treated for Metastatic Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2001;
19(1):
72 - 80.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Robinson and R G Thomson
The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation
Qual. Saf. Health Care,
December 1, 2000;
9(4):
238 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. N. Dionisio, R. K. Taira, U. Sinha, D. B. Johnson, B. Y. Dai, G. H. Tashima, S. Blythe, R. Johnson, and H. Kangarloo
Teleradiology as a Foundation for an Enterprise-wide Health Care Delivery System
RadioGraphics,
July 1, 2000;
20(4):
1137 - 1150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Rosenfeld, M. H. Bhaya, C. M. Bower, P. E. Brookhouser, M. L. Casselbrant, K. H. Chan, M. J. Cunningham, C. S. Derkay, S. D. Gray, S. C. Manning, et al.
Impact of Tympanostomy Tubes on Child Quality of Life
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,
May 1, 2000;
126(5):
585 - 592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Sainfort and B. C. Booske
Measuring Post-decision Satisfaction
Med Decis Making,
January 1, 2000;
20(1):
51 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Molenaar, M. A.G. Sprangers, F. C.E. Postma-Schuit, E. J. Th. Rutgers, J. Noorlander, J. Hendriks, and H. C.J.M. De Haes
Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids
Med Decis Making,
January 1, 2000;
20(1):
112 - 127.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Edwards and G. Elwyn
How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged?: A Review of the Literature
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 1999;
19(4):
428 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Edwards and G. Elwyn
The Potential Benefits of Decision Aids in Clinical Medicine
JAMA,
August 25, 1999;
282(8):
779 - 780.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Loblaw and A. Bezjak
Development and Testing of a Visit-Specific Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire: The Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 1999;
17(6):
1931 - 1931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Dolan
A Method for Evaluating Health Care Providers' Decision Making: The Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument
Med Decis Making,
January 1, 1999;
19(1):
38 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. O'Connor, V. Fiset, C. DeGrasse, I. D. Graham, W. Evans, D. Stacey, A. Laupacis, and P. Tugwell
Decision Aids for Patients Considering Options Affecting Cancer Outcomes: Evidence of Efficacy and Policy Implications
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs,
January 1, 1999;
1999(25):
67 - 80.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Street JR and B. Voigt
Patient Participation in Deciding Breast Cancer Treatment and Subsequent Quality of Life
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 1997;
17(3):
298 - 306.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Ubel
Informed Consent: From Bodily Invasion to the Seemingly Mundane
Arch Intern Med,
June 24, 1996;
156(12):
1262 - 1263.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|