Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cappelleri, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Trochim, W. M.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cappelleri, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Trochim, W. M.K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ethical and Scientific Features of Cutoff-based Designs of Clinical Trials

A Simulation Study

Joseph C. Cappelleri, PhD, MPH

William M.K. Trochim, PhD

Cutoff-based clinical trial designs are geared towards balancing ethical and scientific con cerns when it is deemed unethical or infeasible to randomize all patients to study treatments. In a cutoff-based design with randomization, patients who are the least sick based on a quantitative baseline indicator are assigned the control treatment, patients who are the most sick based on the same indicator are assigned to test treatment, and patients who are moderately sick based on the indicator are randomly assigned. Simulations were conducted to examine statistical efficiency and potential bias for designs with varying amounts of cutoff- based assignment and randomization. All design variations yielded unbiased estimates of a main treatment effect and a linear interaction effect. While randomization tends to lead to greater efficiency (or lower standard errors of treatment effect), the correlation between the binary treatment variable and baseline assignment variable completely determines the ef ficiency of a design. Key words: clinical trials; randomized control trials; randomization; cutoff- based designs; experimental designs; quasi-experimental designs; methodology; statistical efficiency; bias. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:387-394)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 4, 387-394 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500409
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval RevHome page
M. B. Mandell
Having One's Cake and Eating It, Too: Combining True Experiments With Regression Discontinuity Designs
Eval Rev, October 1, 2008; 32(5): 415 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
H. P. Lehmann
Are We Ready for Patient-Based Effect Sizes in Clinical-Trials Research?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 248 - 249.
[PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
D. M. Kent, A. M. Fendrick, and K. M. Langa
New and Dis-Improved: On the Evaluation and Use of Less Effective, Less Expensive Medical Interventions
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2004; 24(3): 281 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]