Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rittenhouse, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rittenhouse, B. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Relevance of Searching for Effects under a Clinical-trial Lamppost

A Key Issue

Brian E. Rittenhouse, PhD

In economic evaluations of new medical technologies, analysts often need to use data from randomized controlled trials. Trials are designed to achieve high internal validity; however, their selected populations and often highly artificial environments may imply low external validity. Thus, the use of trial data in an economic evaluation may bias the results, since economic evaluation is concerned not with theoretical capability in a trial but with likely performance in the practice environment. This paper indicates both the probable bias of one aspect of artificiality in the trial environment—selected populations—and a method of ad justing the analysis so that results will be more likely to reflect actual practice. The judicious use of extra-trial information can be used to correct the biases of clinical trials. Key words: efficacy; effectiveness; clinical trials; diagnosis; external validity; bias; sepsis; bacteremia. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:348-357)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 4, 348-357 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. D. Reed, P. W. Dillingham, A. H. Briggs, D. L. Veenstra, and S. D. Sullivan
A Bayesian Approach to Aid in Formulary Decision Making: Incorporating Institution-Specific Cost-Effectiveness Data with Clinical Trial Results
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 252 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
B. E. Rittenhouse
Exorcising Protocol-induced Spirits:: Making the Clinical Trial Relevant for Economics
Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]