This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Redelmeier, D. A. Articles by Tversky, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Redelmeier, D. A. Articles by Tversky, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Probability Judgment in Medicine

Discounting Unspecified Possibilities

Derek J. Koehler, PhD

Varda Liberman, PhD

Amos Tversky, PhD

Research in cognitive psychology has indicated that alternative descriptions of the same event can give rise to different probability judgments. This observation has led to the de velopment of a descriptive account, called support theory, which assumes that the judged probability of an explicit description of an event (that lists specific possibilities) generally exceeds the judged probability of an implicit description of the same event (that does not mention specific possibilities). To investigate this assumption in medical judgment, the au thors presented physicians with brief clinical scenarios describing individual patients and elicited diagnostic and prognostic probability judgments. The results showed that the phy sicians tended to discount unspecified possibilities, as predicted by support theory. The authors suggest that an awareness of the discrepancy between intuitive judgments and the laws of chance may provide opportunities for improving medical decision making. Key words: probability judgment; support theory; unpacking principle; cognition. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:227-230)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 3, 227-230 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Tait Vulnerability in clinical research with patients in pain: a risk analysis. J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2009; 37(1): 59 - 72. [PDF]

				A. Baillon Eliciting Subjective Probabilities Through Exchangeable Events: An Advantage and a Limitation Decision Analysis, June 1, 2008; 5(2): 76 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Lewis, C. G. Moore, C. E. Golin, J. Griffith, A. Tytell-Brenner, and M. P. Pignone Resident Physicians' Life Expectancy Estimates and Colon Cancer Screening Recommendations in Elderly Patients Med Decis Making, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Jeerakathil, J. A. Johnson, S. H. Simpson, and S. R. Majumdar Short-Term Risk for Stroke Is Doubled in Persons With Newly Treated Type 2 Diabetes Compared With Persons Without Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1739 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Cahan, D. Gilon, O. Manor, and O. Paltiel Probabilistic reasoning and clinical decision-making: do doctors overestimate diagnostic probabilities? QJM, October 1, 2003; 96(10): 763 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S Elstein and A. Schwarz Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature BMJ, March 23, 2002; 324(7339): 729 - 732. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Seidenwurm, C. H. McDonnell III, N. Raghavan, and J. Breslau Cost Utility Analysis of Radiographic Screening for an Orbital Foreign Body before MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2000; 21(2): 426 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Schwartz Judgmental Psychology Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 142 - 143. [PDF]

				C. R. Fox and A. Tversky A Belief-Based Account of Decision Under Uncertainty Management Science, July 1, 1998; 44(7): 879 - 895. [Abstract] [PDF]