|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Effects of Computer-assisted Electrocardiographic Interpretation on Physicians' Diagnostic Decisions
Steven D. Hillson, MD, MSc
Donald P. Connelly, MD, PhD
Yuanli Liu, MS
Objective. To evaluate the effect of computer-assisted interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) on diagnostic decision making by primary care physicians. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Primary care physicians' outpatient clinics in or near the Minneap olis/St. Paul metropolitan area. Participants. Forty family physicians and general internists who were members of either of two large consortia of clinics. Intervention. Subjects evaluated ten clinical vignettes accompanied by ECGs and reported their diagnostic impressions. The vignettes were based on actual patient visits. Half of the subjects received ECGs with computer-generated reports, the other half received the same ECGs without reports. Main outcome measures. ECG reading time; agreement with the clinical diagnosis; agreement with the computer report; diagnostic confidence. Results. The subjects receiving the reports were more likely to agree with the clinical diagnoses of the original cases, particularly for two vignettes in which the diagnoses were uncommon and were mentioned in the reports. The subjects receiving the reports were also more likely to make diagnoses that were consistent with the reports, even when the reports were erroneous. Those receiving the reports spent, on average, 15 seconds less time looking at each ECG, a 25% decrease. Conclusions. In simulated cases, primary care physicians appear to use computer interpre tations of ECGs when available, as shown by enhanced diagnostic accuracy and modestly reduced time spent reading the tracings. However, erroneous reports may mislead physi cians. Since the effects of computerized ECG interpretation do not appear to have been uniformly favorable in this mock-clinical setting, it will be important to evaluate the effects of this technology in actual practice. Key words: computer-assisted diagnosis; computer-as sisted decision making; physician decision making; electrocardiogram. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:107-112)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 15, No. 2,
107-112 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500202

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. N. Southern and J. H. Arnsten
The Effect of Erroneous Computer Interpretation of ECGs on Resident Decision Making
Med Decis Making,
May 1, 2009;
29(3):
372 - 376.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Goldman and A. J. Kirtane
Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Possible Cardiac Ischemia: The Elusive Search for Diagnostic Perfection
Ann Intern Med,
December 16, 2003;
139(12):
987 - 995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Tsai, D. B. Fridsma, and G. Gatti
Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of Electrocardiograms
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.,
September 1, 2003;
10(5):
478 - 483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Salerno, P. C. Alguire, and H. S. Waxman
Training and Competency Evaluation for Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med,
May 6, 2003;
138(9):
747 - 750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Salerno, P. C. Alguire, and H. S. Waxman
Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence
Ann Intern Med,
May 6, 2003;
138(9):
751 - 760.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Goodacre, A Webster, and F Morris
Do computer generated ECG reports improve interpretation by accident and emergency senior house officers?
Postgrad. Med. J.,
July 1, 2001;
77(909):
455 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Brailer, E. Kroch, and M. V. Pauly
The impact of Computer-assisted Test Interpretation on Physician Decision Making: The Case of Electrocardiograms
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 1997;
17(1):
80 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Shortliffe
When Decision Support Doesn't Support
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1995;
15(2):
187 - 188.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|