This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Van Der Schouw, Y. T. Articles by Verbeek, A. L.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van Der Schouw, Y. T. Articles by Verbeek, A. L.M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

ROC Curves and the Areas under Them for Dichotomized Tests

Empirical Findings for Logistically and Normally Distributed Diagnostic Test Results

Huub Straatman

Andre L.M. Verbeek

Many measures, including sensitivity and specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios, are available for the assessment of diagnostic tests. A drawback of the use of these measures is that continuous test results are often dichotomized, with consequent loss of information. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves do not depend on discrimination thresholds, and therefore the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is one of the preferred measures. Although quantitative test results are often presented dichotomized, it would be convenient still to be able to estimate the ROC curve and the AUC. The authors present equations for such estimates when only one pair of a true- and a false-positive rate is given, for inherently logistically and normally distributed data. Illustrative empirical data are provided for both distributions. In contradiction to earlier reports, the authors also show that differential disease verification may skew the ROC curve. The ROC curve is thus not invariant to selection bias. Key words: diagnosis; test assessment; ROC curves; verification bias; sensitivity; specificity; colorectal carcinoma; acute myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 1994;14:374-381)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 4, 374-381 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400408


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Tangri, D. Ansell, and D. Naimark Predicting technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: comparing artificial neural networks and logistic regression Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2972 - 2981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mohlig, J. Spranger, M. Ristow, A. F H Pfeiffer, T. Schill, H. W Schlosser, L. Moltz, G. Brabant, and C. Schofl Predictors of abnormal glucose metabolism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 154(2): 295 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sozzi, D. Conte, M. Leon, R. Cirincione, L. Roz, C. Ratcliffe, E. Roz, N. Cirenei, M. Bellomi, G. Pelosi, et al. Quantification of Free Circulating DNA As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 21(21): 3902 - 3908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ceriani, M. Mazzoni, F. Bortone, S. Gandini, C. Solinas, G. Susini, and O. Parodi Application of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Cardiac Surgical Patients Chest, April 1, 2003; 123(4): 1229 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. van den Hout The Area under an ROC Curve with Limited Information Med Decis Making, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 160 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-P. Couderc, P. Chevalier, J. Fayn, P. Rubel, and P. Touboul Identification of post-myocardial infarction patients prone to ventricular tachycardia using time-frequency analysis of QRS and ST segments Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 141 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]