|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Effect of Physicians' Explanations on Patients' Treatment Preferences
Five-year Survival Data
Dennis J. Mazur
David H. Hickam
Objective: To evaluate the influence of physicians' explanations on patients' choices. Setting: A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Participants: 136 patients seen in a continuity-care general medicine clinic. Measurements and Results: Patients were randomized to two groups [Limited Explanation (LE) and Extensive Explanation (EE)] and asked to choose between two alternative treatments (differing in short-term vs long-term survival benefits) for an unidentified medical condition, based on the information given in the explanations. LE consisted of a brief orientation to graphs summarizing the treatment results, while EE consisted of a detailed verbal description of the graphs. Significantly (p < 0.001) more patients receiving EE changed their preferences across three pairs of five-year survival curves, compared with patients receiving LE. Of the patients receiving EE, 57% reported either medium-term (year 0-to-intercept or intercept-to-year 5) data or the average life expectancy for the five-year period contained in the curves (ALE-5) as most influencing their decision making; whereas 78% of patients receiving LE reported only endpoint (year 0 or year 5) data as most influencing their preferences. Conclusions: The patients' treatment preferences for long-term vs short-term survival benefits were influenced by the amounts of verbal explanation provided to them about five-year survival graphs summarizing treatment results. The patients appeared to minimize the importance of medium-range data when those data were not specifically pointed out to them. Key words: cognitive biases; framing effect; informed consent; medical decision making; preferences; five-year survival; life expectancy. (Med Decis Making 1994;14:255-258)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 3,
255-258 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400307

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, D. M. Smith, P. A. Ubel, and A. Fagerlin
Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
663 - 671.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. M. Lipkus
Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 2007;
27(5):
696 - 713.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Ancker, Y. Senathirajah, R. Kukafka, and J. B. Starren
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.,
November 1, 2006;
13(6):
608 - 618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. McNutt
Shared Medical Decision Making: Problems, Process, Progress
JAMA,
November 24, 2004;
292(20):
2516 - 2518.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Armstrong, J. S. Schwartz, G. Fitzgerald, M. Putt, and P. A. Ubel
Effect of Framing as Gain versus Loss on Understanding and Hypothetical Treatment Choices: Survival and Mortality Curves
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 2002;
22(1):
76 - 83.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Edwards and G. Elwyn
How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged?: A Review of the Literature
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 1999;
19(4):
428 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Miles, R. Koepp, and E. P. Weber
Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning
Arch Intern Med,
May 27, 1996;
156(10):
1062 - 1068.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|