Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timmermans, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Timmermans, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Roles of Experience and Domain of Expertise in Using Numerical and Verbal Probability Terms in Medical Decisions

Daniëlle Timmermans

Verbal probability terms are frequently used in medical practice. In the present experiment the use of verbal and numerical probability terms in medical decisions was investigated. Interns, residents in surgery and internal medicine, surgeons, and internists were asked to make treatment decisions for three different cases (acute appendicitis, angina pectoris, and an imaginary disease) and were also asked to give numerical interpretations of a series of verbal probability terms. In the second stage of the experiment the respondents received the same cases, but with numerical probability terms. The results showed no effect of context or of domain experience on the interpretation of verbal terms. Residents and experienced surgeons more often agreed on treatment decisions when chance information was presented in numerical terms as compared with verbal terms. Physicians were less confident when verbal terms were presented, but only for the less familiar decision problems. Finally, phy sicians turned out to be better in Bayesian reasoning when numerical terms were used. Experienced physicians were quite accurate in estimating the posterior probability in the appendicitis case, but not in the imaginary-disease case. Key words: verbal probabilities; Bayesian reasoning; expertise. (Med Decis Making 1994;14:146-156)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 2, 146-156 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9401400207
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
N. T. Brewer, J. P. Tzeng, S. E. Lillie, A. S. Edwards, J. M. Peppercorn, and B. K. Rimer
Health Literacy and Cancer Risk Perception: Implications for Genomic Risk Communication
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 157 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
F. E.F. Mevissen, R. M. Meertens, R. A.C. Ruiter, H. Feenstra, and H. P. Schaalma
HIV/STI Risk Communication: The Effects of Scenario-based Risk Information and Frequency-based Risk Information on Perceived Susceptibility to Chlamydia and HIV
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 78 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 QJMHome page
A. Schattner and R.H. Fletcher
Research evidence and the individual patient
QJM, January 1, 2003; 96(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]