Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hersh, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hickam, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hersh, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hickam, D. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Two Methods for Indexing and Retrieval from a Full-text Medical Database

William R. Hersh

David H. Hickam

The objective of this study was to compare how well medical professionals are able to retrieve relevant literature references using two computerized literature searching systems that provide automated (non-human) indexing of content. The first program was SAPHIRE, which features concept-based indexing, free-text input of queries, and ranking of retrieved references for relevance. The second program was SWORD, which provides single-word searching using Boolean operators (AND, OR). Sixteen fourth-year medical students partici pated in the study. The database for searching was six volumes from the 1989 Yearbook series. The queries were ten questions generated on teaching rounds. All subjects searched half the queries with each program. After the searching, each subject was given a ques tionnaire about prior experience and preferences about the two programs. Recall (proportion of relevant articles retrieved from the database) and precision (proportion of relevant articles in the retrieved set) were measured for each search done by each participant. Mean recall was 57.6% with SAPHIRE; it was 58.6% with SWORD. Precision was 48.1% with SAPHIRE VS 57.6% with SWORD. Each program was rated easier to use than the other by half of the searchers, and preferences were associated with better searching performance for that program. Both systems achieved recall and precision comparable to existing systems and may represent effective alternatives to MEDLINE and other retrieval systems based on human indexing for searching medical literature. Key words: information retrieval systems; auto mated indexing; medical literature; MEDLINE. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:220-226)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 3, 220-226 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300308
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
R. Moskovitch, S. B. Martins, E. Behiri, A. Weiss, and Y. Shahar
A Comparative Evaluation of Full-text, Concept-based, and Context-sensitive Search
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2007; 14(2): 164 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. H. Brown, T. Speroff, E. M. Fielstein, B. A. Bauer, D. L. Wahner-Roedler, R. Greevy, and P. L. Elkin
eQuality: Electronic Quality Assessment From Narrative Clinical Reports
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2006; 81(11): 1472 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]