Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redelmeier, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redelmeier, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, D. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Time Preference in Medical Decision Making and Cost - Effectiveness Analysis

Donald A. Redelmeier

Daniel N. Heller

Cost-effectiveness analyses usually quantify peoples' attitudes towards delayed outcomes using the exponential discount model. The authors examined three assumptions of this model by assessing the time preferences of individuals towards hypothetical health states and calculating implicit annual discount rates. Of a random sample of medical students, house officers, and attending physicians, 121 participated, reflecting a response rate of 81%. The participants considered three temporary events (colostomy, blindness, depression) that were destined to occur at five sequentially distant times in the future (one day, six months, one year, five years, and ten years). The utility of each prospect was measured using two elicitation techniques (standard gamble and categorical scaling), and 1,394 implicit discount rates were calculated. Of all the discount rates, 62.1 % equalled zero, 10.0% were less than 0.00, and 15.7% were greater than 0.10. Mean discount rates for relatively proximal time intervals tended to be larger than those for relatively more distant intervals (0.041 vs. 0.025, p < 0.01). Mean discount rates for blindness tended to be smaller than those for colostomy or depression (0.023 vs 0.039 vs 0.037, respectively, p < 0.005). Hence, peoples' implicit discount rates are not always small positive numbers that are constant over time and the same for all settings. The authors suggest that the conventional exponential discount model may not fully characterize the time preferences held by individuals. Key words: cost-effec tiveness; time preferences; exponential discount model. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:212- 217)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 3, 212-217 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Gupta, M. E. Faughnan, and A. M. Bayoumi
Embolization for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Decision Analysis
Chest, September 1, 2009; 136(3): 849 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. B. Chapman
Your Money or Your Health: Time Preferences and Trading Money for Health
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2002; 22(5): 410 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. M. Bayoumi and D. A. Redelmeier
Decision Analysis with Cumulative Prospect Theory
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2000; 20(4): 404 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. G. Ganiats, R. T. Carson, R. M. Hamm, S. B. Cantor, W. Sumner, S. J. Spann, M. D. Hagen, and C. Miller
Population-based Time Preferences for Future Health Outcomes
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. Cairns and M. Van Der Pol
Do People Value Their Own Future Health Differently from Others' Future Health?
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 466 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. A.E. Nickerson
Assessing Convergent Validity of Health-state Utilities Obtained Using Different Scaling Methods
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. B. Chapman and E. J. Coups
Time Preferences and Preventive Health Behavior: Acceptance of the Influenza Vaccine
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. B. Chapman and A. S. Elstein
Valuing the Future: Temporal Discounting of Health and Money
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1995; 15(4): 373 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Gafni
Time in Health: Can We Measure Individuals' "Pure Time Preferences"?
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1995; 15(1): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. G. Ganiats
Discounting in Cost - Effectiveness Research
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1994; 14(3): 298 - 300.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. A. Redelmeier, D. N. Heller, and M. C. Weinstein
Time Preference in Medical Economics: Science or Religion?
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1994; 14(3): 301 - 303.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Johannesson, J. S. Pliskin, and M. C. Weinstein
A Note on QALYs, Time Tradeoff, and Discounting
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1994; 14(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. C. Weinstein
Time-preference Studies in the Health Care Context
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1993; 13(3): 218 - 219.
[PDF]