Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guangqin Ma
Right arrow Articles by Hall, W.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guangqin Ma,
Right arrow Articles by Hall, W.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Confidence Bands for Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

Guangqin Ma

W.J. Hall

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are mapped out by the two types of errors that are generated by varying the decision threshold used to determine which subjects will be considered abnormal. Under the conventional binormal model for the ROC curve, two- sided and one-sided simultaneous confidence bands for an entire ROC curve, or for a portion of an ROC curve, are constructed by employing Working-Hotelling-type confidence bands for simple linear regression. Pointwise confidence bands are presented for comparison. The cases in which one has only asymptotically normally distributed estimates of the parameters of the ROC curve and consistent estimates of their variance-covariance matrix are em phasized. The methods extend beyond binormal models. Key words: confidence bands for linear regression; ROC curves. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:191-197)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 3, 191-197 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C. Pitsavos, D. B. Panagiotakos, J. Skoumas, L. Papadimitriou, and C. Stefanadis
Risk Stratification of Apolipoprotein B, Apolipoprotein A1, and Apolipoprotein B/AI Ratio on the Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome: the ATTICA Study
Angiology, July 1, 2008; 59(3): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. Xiong, D. W. McKeel Jr, J. P. Miller, and J. C. Morris
Combining Correlated Diagnostic Tests: Application to Neuropathologic Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 659 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. J. Thomalla, T. Kucinski, V. Schoder, J. Fiehler, R. Knab, H. Zeumer, C. Weiller, and J. Rother
Prediction of Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction by Early Perfusion- and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1892 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. S. Heckerling
Parametric Three-Way Receiver Operating Characteristic Surface Analysis Using Mathematica
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2001; 21(5): 409 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
D. E Shapiro
The interpretation of diagnostic tests
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 113 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Swaving, H. Van Houwelingen, F. P. Ottes, and T. Steerneman
Statistical Comparison of ROC Curves from Multiple Readers
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1996; 16(2): 143 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]