|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Integrating Stratum-specific Likelihood Ratios with the Analysis of ROC Curves
John C. Peirce
Richard G. Cornell
Data used to construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and to calculate the area under the curve (ROC AUC) can be used to derive stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% Cls). The purpose of this study was to determine whether useful information can be obtained by adding SSLRs to the analysis of ROC curves. The authors analyzed four previously reported sets of data: 1) serum creatine kinase (SCK) for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the coronary care unit (CCU); 2) SCK in the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency center (EC); 3) four predictor variables in the diagnosis of strep throat; and 4) the ordinal assessment of computed tom ographic (CT) images. Use of SCK in the CCU produced four strata that had posttest probabilities that were highly discriminating, whereas SCK in the EC resulted in only two strata with limited discriminating ability. In either study the cutpoint at which the SSLR changed from less than to greater than 1.0 was higher than the reported upper normal for the test, thereby quantitating spectrum bias. The maximum number of strata of predictor signs and symptoms for strep throat was three rather than the five used in previous studies. With a larger sample size or pooling, four strata could probably be developed. With CT images, "definitely normal," "probably normal," and "questionable" were collapsed to one negative stratum. "Probably abnormal" became the true "questionable" stratum and "defi nitely abnormal" was the only positive stratum. The authors conclude that additional useful information is obtained by deriving stratum-specific likelihood ratios as part of the analysis of an ROC curve. Key words: diagnosis; decision making; ROC curves; likelihood ratios. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:141-151)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 2,
141-151 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300208

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Russo, R. R. Davies, K. N. Hong, A. Iribarne, S. Kawut, M. Bacchetta, F. D'Ovidio, S. Arcasoy, and J. R. Sonett
Who is the high-risk recipient? Predicting mortality after lung transplantation using pretransplant risk factors.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
November 1, 2009;
138(5):
1234 - 1238.e1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Russo, A. Rana, J. M. Chen, K. N. Hong, A. Gelijns, A. Moskowitz, W. D. Widmann, L. Ratner, Y. Naka, and M. A. Hardy
Pretransplantation Patient Characteristics and Survival Following Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
Arch Surg,
March 1, 2009;
144(3):
241 - 246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Russo, J. M. Chen, R. A. Sorabella, T. P. Martens, M. Garrido, R. R. Davies, I. George, F. H. Cheema, R. S. Mosca, S. Mital, et al.
The effect of ischemic time on survival after heart transplantation varies by donor age: An analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
February 1, 2007;
133(2):
554 - 559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Russo, R. R. Davies, R. A. Sorabella, T. P. Martens, I. George, F. H. Cheema, S. Mital, R. S. Mosca, and J. M. Chen
Adult-age donors offer acceptable long-term survival to pediatric heart transplant recipients: An analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
November 1, 2006;
132(5):
1208 - 1212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mossman
Another Look at Interpreting Risk Categories
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,
January 1, 2006;
18(1):
41 - 63.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Bodnar, A. M. Siega-Riz, W. C. Miller, M. E. Cogswell, and T. McDonald
Who Should Be Screened for Postpartum Anemia? An Evaluation of Current Recommendations
Am. J. Epidemiol.,
November 15, 2002;
156(10):
903 - 912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mossman and J. O. Berger
Intervals for Posttest Probabilities: A Comparison of 5 Methods
Med Decis Making,
December 1, 2001;
21(6):
498 - 507.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mossman
Three-way ROCs
Med Decis Making,
January 1, 1999;
19(1):
78 - 89.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Parker, D. R. Peven, J. C. Peirce, R. M. Hoffman, W. J. Catalona, and P. C. Southwick
Free PSA for Detecting Prostate Cancer
JAMA,
December 2, 1998;
280(21):
1825 - 1825.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Peirce, R. M. Hoffman, and D. L. Clanon
PSA Thresholds for Prostate Cancer Detection
JAMA,
September 3, 1997;
278(9):
700 - 700.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Peirce
The Utility of Prostate-Specific Antigen for Detecting Prostate Cancer
JAMA,
August 23, 1995;
274(8):
608 - 608.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|