This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Deneef, P. Articles by Kent, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Deneef, P. Articles by Kent, D. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Using Treatment-tradeoff Preferences to Select Diagnostic Strategies

Linking the ROC Curve to Threshold Analysis

Daniel L. Kent

Selection of optimal diagnostic strategies depends on the accuracy of diagnostic tests, the prevalence of disease, and the relative benefits and harms resulting from test/treatment choices. One can characterize diagnostic strategies according to their net benefit-to-harm ratios. Within the framework of expected-utility theory, the benefit-to-harm ratio is equivalent to the marginal tradeoff between erroneous and correct treatment choices. Consequently, a physician can identify his or her preferred strategy by asking the question: "How many additional treatment errors am I willing to make in order to treat one additional person correctly?" Family physicians were asked to indicate their lowest and highest acceptable tradeoff ratios in a survey about streptococcal pharyngitis. All 53 respondents indicated uncertainty about their preferred treatment-tradeoff ratios. For 58% of respondents, the midpoints of the acceptable range of tradeoff ratios corresponded to generally accepted diagnostic strategies: 1) test all or 2) treat if classic, test all others. In contrast, previously published patient utilities yield a treatment-tradeoff ratio that corresponds to the strategy of treating all cases. The analysis illustrates the linkage between the optimal operating point on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the selection of a preferred diagnostic strategy based on treatment thresholds derived from benefit-to-harm ratios. The survey results indicate that physicians can respond directly to questions assessing their preferences for such treatment thresholds. Differences between patients and physicians have significant impacts on choices of test and treatment strategies. Key words: decision making; utility assessment; ROC curve; laboratory diagnosis; streptococcal pharyngitis. (Med Decis Mak ing 1993;13:126-132)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 2, 126-132 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300206


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Jund, M. Rabilloud, M. Wallon, and R. Ecochard Methods to Estimate the Optimal Threshold for Normally or Log-Normally Distributed Biological Tests Med Decis Making, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. G.M. Moons, T. Stijnen, B. C. Michel, H. R. Buller, G.-A. Van Es, D. E. Grobbee, and J. D. F. Habbema Application of Treatment Thresholds to Diagnostic-test Evaluation: An Alternative to the Comparison of Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves Med Decis Making, October 1, 1997; 17(4): 447 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]