This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Knottnerus, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Knottnerus, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Application of Logistic Regression to the Analysis of Diagnostic Data

Exact Modeling of a Probability Tree of Multiple Binary Variables

In the analysis and presentation of diagnostic relationships by means of conventional multiple logistic regression, the following limitations occur. 1) the model starts not from the prior disease odds but from the posterior disease odds for all test variables having a zero value, 2) apart from the odds ratio, other test characteristics cannot be read from the model ; 3) the sequence of entering of terms is guided by pure statistical criteria and not primarily by the criterion gain in certainty; 4) interactions are not very comprehensibly represented and are difficult to interpret. A method dealing with these limitations with respect to the analysis of data on the relationships between binary tests and disease outcome is described. Essential is the transformation of any test variable x to (x - x₀), where x₀ is that specific (virtual) value of x so that: posterior disease odds = prior disease odds, and consequently LR _x0 = 1 Moreover, a simple branching structure is introduced while the terms are entered in order of decreasing gain in certainty. Examples are given for one-, two-, and three-test situations with and without dependency and interaction of tests, and general formulas are presented. For situations with the same prior probability, and the same overall discrimination of the separate test variables, all equations clearly have a common basis. Inclusion of new variables does not affect coefficients previously included in the model, and terms without a significant contribution can be skipped without affecting other coefficients. Standard errors and confi dence intervals of test characteristics can be computed using the BMDP® LR program. Further study needs to be done on the inclusion of continuous variables and cost-benefit aspects, and comparison with the performance of the CART^® program. Key words logistic regression, Bayes' theorem; dependency; Interaction, sequence, multiple testing. (Med Decis Making 1992; 12:93-108)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 12, No. 2, 93-108 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. P.S. Dosanjh, T. S.C. Hinks, J. A. Innes, J. J. Deeks, G. Pasvol, S. Hackforth, H. Varia, K. A. Millington, R. Gunatheesan, V. Guyot-Revol, et al. Improved Diagnostic Evaluation of Suspected Tuberculosis Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2008; 148(5): 325 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Cronin, B. A. Dwamena, A. M. Kelly, and R. C. Carlos Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Meta-analytic Comparison of Cross-sectional Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Malignancy Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 772 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. J. W. Janssens, Y. Deng, G. J. J. M. Borsboom, M. J. C. Eijkemans, J. Dik. F. Habbema, and E. W. Steyerberg A New Logistic Regression Approach for the Evaluation of Diagnostic Test Results Med Decis Making, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 168 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]