Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alemi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alemi, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Improving the Accuracy of Severity Indexes

Exceptions to the Rules

Farrokh Alemi, PhD

This study explores the difference between additive and non-additive indexes in measuring the severity of myocardial infarction. It shows, as an example, the fallacy of adding severity scores in a straightforward manner. An additive severity index was constructed from the judgments of seven experts The experts also identified several exceptions to the additive index. The study used the exceptions to modify the additive index and produce a non-additive severity index. The non-additive seventy index explained 36% more of the variance in the seventy judgments made by five physicians and two nurses on 50 hypothetical cases than the additive index did. In addition, the non-additive index was 3% more accurate in predicting in-hospital mortality of 7,500 patients with myocardial infarction When the study reduced the noise in the data by ignoring 1,200 rare cases in which stable estimates of mortality rate were unavailable, the prediction of the non-additive index was 13% more accurate than that of the additive index. Statistical tests showed that the differences between the additive and the non-additive indexes were significant at an alpha level below 1% The practical impli cations of non-additive seventy indexes are discussed Researchers and physicians who assess the severity of myocardial infarction should systematically explore exceptions that may improve the accuracy of prediction of an additive index. Key words seventy indexes; additive indexes; non-additive indexes; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 1992; 12:8-14)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 12, No. 1, 8-14 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?