This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heckerling, P. S. Articles by Wigton, R. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heckerling, P. S. Articles by Wigton, R. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Relation of Physicians' Predicted Probabilities of Pneumonia to Their Utilities for Ordering Chest X-rays to Detect Pneumonia

Thomas G. Tape, MD

Robert S. Wigton, MD

To investigate the relation between physicians' predicted probabilities of pneumonia and their utilities for ordering chest x-rays to detect pneumonia, the authors studied 52 physicians who ordered chest x-rays of 886 patients presenting to an emergency department with fever or respiratory complaints Physicians estimated the probability of pneumonia prior to obtaining the results of the chest x-ray. Utilities were assessed by asking physicians to consider a hypothetical patient presenting with acute respiratory symptoms, with unknown chest x-ray status, and to rank on a scale from +50 ("best thing I could do") to - 50 ("worst thing I could do") their rating scale utilities for not diagnosing pneumonia and not ordering a chest x-ray when the patient had pneumonia (i.e, missing a pneumonia), and for diagnosing pneumonia and ordering a chest x-ray when the patient did not have pneumonia (i.e, ordering an unnecessary x-ray) The utility for ordering an unnecessary x-ray was negatively correlated with average predicted probability (r = -0 1495, p = 0 29), whereas the utility for missing a pneumonia was positively correlated with average predicted probability (r = 0 2254, p = 0.11), although the correlations were not statistically significant. Relative chagrin, defined as the difference in these utilities, was significantly inversely correlated with average predicted probability (r = -0 2992, p < 0.035), even after adjusting for the prevalence of pneumonia seen by each physician (partial r = - 0.42, p < 0 0027). It is concluded that physicians who experienced greater regret over missing a pneumonia than over ordering an unnecessary x-ray estimated lower probabilities of pneumonia for patients for whom they ordered x-rays. Thus, these physicians may have had lower thresholds for ordering chest x-rays for patients with acute respiratory illness. Key words: prediction, probability; utility, pneumonia. (Med Decis Making 1992;12:32-38)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 12, No. 1, 32-38 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Egger, G. R. Cutter, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, W. E. Barlow, R. E. Hendrick, C. J. D'Orsi, J. S. Fosse, L. Abraham, and J. G. Elmore Mammographers' Perception of Women's Breast Cancer Risk Med Decis Making, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Sorum, E. Mullet, J. Shim, S. Bonnin-Scaon, G. Chasseigne, and J. Cogneau Avoidance of Anticipated Regret: The Ordering of Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests Med Decis Making, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 149 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. L. Carter, C. D. Butler, J. C. Rogers, and R. L. Holloway Evaluation of Physician Decision Making With the Use of Prior Probabilities and a Decision-Analysis Model Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1993; 2(5): 529 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]