Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganiats, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganiats, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, R. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Circumcision
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Routine Neonatal Circumcision

A Cost-Utility Analysis

Theodore G. Ganiats, MD

Jonathan B.C. Humphrey, MD

Howard L. Taras, MD

Robert M. Kaplan, PhD

A cost-utility analysis was performed to evaluate the relative importance of each of the various elements in the current circumcision debate. Elements used in the analysis included the cost of the procedure, the pain associated with the procedure, the risk of urinary tract infections, and the risk of penile cancer. The net, discounted lifetime dollar cost of routine circumcision is $102 per person, while the net, discounted lifetime health cost is 14 hours of healthy life. These results suggest that the financial and medical advantages and dis advantages of routine neonatal circumcision cancel each other and that factors other than cost or health outcomes must be used in decision making. Key words: cost-utility analysis; circumcision; urinary tract infection. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:282-293)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 4, 282-292 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Mens HealthHome page
Xiao Xu, D. A. Patel, V. K. Dalton, M. D. Pearlman, and T. R. B. Johnson
Can Routine Neonatal Circumcision Help Prevent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission in the United States?
American Journal of Men's Health, March 1, 2009; 3(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. S. Van Howe
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. T. Gray
Neonatal Circumcision: Cost-Effective Preventive Measure or "the Unkindest Cut of All"?
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 688 - 692.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
F M Hodges, J S Svoboda, and R S Van Howe
Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2002; 28(1): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. G. Ganiats, R. T. Carson, R. M. Hamm, S. B. Cantor, W. Sumner, S. J. Spann, M. D. Hagen, and C. Miller
Population-based Time Preferences for Future Health Outcomes
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. R. Storms, Y. Schlesinger, and J. Urbach
Circumcision and Endocarditis Prophylaxis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 1998; 152(10): 1038 - 1039.
[Full Text] [PDF]