|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Use of Clinical Judgment Analysis to Explain Regional Variations in Physicians' Accuracies in Diagnosing Pneumonia
Thomas G. Tape, MD
Paul S. Heckerling, MD
Joseph P. Ornato, MD
Robert S. Wigton, MD
The authors sought to explain regional differences in physicians' accuracies in diagnosing pneumonia by prospectively studying emergency department patients at three sites and analyzing differences in physicians' diagnostic strategies and patient characteristics. They enrolled 1,119 Illinois patients, 150 Nebraska patients, and 142 Virginia patients presenting with fever or respiratory symptoms for whom physicians ordered a chest radiograph because of suspicion of pneumonia. Emergency department physicians recorded patients' clinical findings and estimated the probability that a chest radiograph would show pneumonia. A measure of accuracy, the correlation between physicians' probability estimates and actual outcomes, was 0.41 (95% Cl 0.36-0.46) at Illinois, 0.66 (95% Cl 0.54-0.75) at Nebraska, and 0.55 (95% Cl 0.42-0.65) at Virginia. Physicians' strategies at the three sites differed markedly in their weightings of asthma, signs of consolidation, cough, tachypnea, age, and gender. These differences in weighting paralleled differences in the optimal clinical strategies derived from patient data at the three sites. Differences in diagnostic accuracy were best explained by differences in the difficulties of diagnosing pneumonia in the populations. Phy sicians at each site used clinical findings in a way that was close to optimal for their location. This type of analysis provides a new tool for understanding the sources of regional variations in clinical practice. Key words: judgment analysis; variation research; pneumonia. (Med Decis Making 1991 ;11 :189-197)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 3,
189-197 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100308

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Kee, J. Jenkins, S. McIlwaine, C. Patterson, S. Harper, and M. Shields
Fast and Frugal Models of Clinical Judgment in Novice and Expert Physicians
Med Decis Making,
July 1, 2003;
23(4):
293 - 300.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Heckerling, B. S. Gerber, T. G. Tape, and R. S. Wigton
Prediction of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Using Artificial Neural Networks
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2003;
23(2):
112 - 121.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Knutsson, L. Lysell, and M. Rohlin
Dentists' Judgment Strategies on Prophylactic Removal of Mandibular Third Molars
Journal of Dental Research,
December 1, 2000;
79(12):
1989 - 1995.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Alexander, S.-Y. D. Lee, J. R. Griffith, S. S. Mick, X. Lin, and J. Banaszak-Holl
Do Market-Level Hospital and Physician Resources Affect Small Area Variation in Hospital Use?
Med Care Res Rev,
March 1, 1999;
56(1):
94 - 117.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Hammond
How Convergence of Research Paradigms Can Improve Research on Diagnostic Judgment
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1996;
16(3):
281 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. R. Arkes
The Covariance Decomposition of the Probability Score and Its Use in Evaluating Prognostic Estimates: Hal R. Arkes, PhD, Neal V. Dawson, Md, Theodore Speroff, PhD, Frank E. Harrell, Jr., PhD, Carlos Alzola, Ms, Russell Phillips, Md, Norman Desbiens, Md, Robert K. Oye, Md, William Knaus, Md, Alfred F. Connors, Jr., Md, and the Support Investigators
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1995;
15(2):
120 - 131.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Heckerling, R. C. Conant, T. G. Tape, and R. S. Wigton
Reproducibility of Predictor Variables from a Validated Clinical Rule
Med Decis Making,
December 1, 1992;
12(4):
280 - 285.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Leibovici, S. Greenshtain, O. Cohen, and A. J. Wysenbeek
Toward Improved Empiric Management of Moderate to Severe Urinary Tract Infections
Arch Intern Med,
December 1, 1992;
152(12):
2481 - 2486.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|