This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mehrez, A. Articles by Gafni, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mehrez, A. Articles by Gafni, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Healthy-years Equivalents

How to Measure Them Using the Standard Gamble Approach

Amiram Gafni, PhD

The healthy-years equivalent (HYE) is a measure of outcome of health care programs that combines two outcomes of interest: quality of life and quantity of life. Unlike QALYs (quality- adjusted life years) HYEs fully represent patients' (or other individuals') preferences, as a result of the way they are calculated from each individual's utility function. The authors suggest an algorithm to measure the HYE of any given lifetime health profile. The algorithm is based on the classic standard gamble method to measure individuals' preferences under uncertainty, and consists of two lottery questions. Algorithms for the general case (any given lifetime health profile) and a simpler case—the chronic health state case—are provided, as is a modification of the algorithm aimed at shortening the length of the interview when an individual is faced with many possible lifetime health profiles. In addition, two questions are addressed. The first is theoretical and deals with the existence of HYE: do all lifetime health profiles, which are preferred to death, have hypothetical equivalents that can be measured in healthy years? The second is empirical and deals with the reproducibility of the measures obtained by using the measurement technique suggested. This is needed because the technique employs a combination of lottery questions that had not previously been used together. The results of an experiment performed to test the reproducibility of the measures were satisfactory. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:140-146)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 2, 140-146 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100212


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. P. Wakker Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in Medical Decision Making Med Decis Making, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 690 - 698. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. B. Hazen Adding Extrinsic Goals to the Quality-Adjusted Life Year Model Decision Analysis, March 1, 2007; 4(1): 3 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Tsuchiya and P. Dolan The QALY Model and Individual Preferences for Health States and Health Profiles over Time: A Systematic Review of the Literature Med Decis Making, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Treadwell Tests of Preferential Independence in the QALY Model Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 418 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. O'Brien, D. Heyland, W. S. Richardson, M. Levine, M. F. Drummond, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XIII. How to Use an Article on Economic Analysis of Clinical Practice B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me in Caring for My Patients? JAMA, June 11, 1997; 277(22): 1802 - 1806. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Holmes A Method to Elicit Utilities for Interpersonal Comparisons Med Decis Making, February 1, 1997; 17(1): 10 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kuppermann, S. Shiboski, D. Feeny, E. P. Elkin, and A. E. Washington Can Preference Scores for Discrete States Be Used to Derive Preference Scores for an Entire Path of Events?: An Application to Prenatal Diagnosis Med Decis Making, February 1, 1997; 17(1): 42 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Kenneth Buckingham, J. Birdsall, and J. G. Douglas Comparing Three Versions of the Time Tradeoff: Time for a Change? Med Decis Making, October 1, 1996; 16(4): 335 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Weinstein and J. S. Pliskin Perspectives on Healthy-years Equivalents: HYEs: What Are the Issues? Med Decis Making, August 1, 1996; 16(3): 205 - 206. [PDF]

				P. Wakker A Criticism of Healthy-years Equivalents Med Decis Making, August 1, 1996; 16(3): 207 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Gafni Time in Health: Can We Measure Individuals' "Pure Time Preferences"? Med Decis Making, February 1, 1995; 15(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Barrett, P. S. Parfrey, R. N. Foley, and A. S. Detsky An Economic Analysis of Strategies for the Use of Contrast Media for Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization Med Decis Making, October 1, 1994; 14(4): 325 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Johannesson, J. S. Pliskin, and M. C. Weinstein Are Healthy-years Equivalents an Improvement over Quality-adjusted Life Years? Med Decis Making, December 1, 1993; 13(4): 281 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Mehrez and A. Gafni Healthy-years Equivalents versus Quality-adjusted Life Years: In Pursuit of Progress Med Decis Making, December 1, 1993; 13(4): 287 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Gafni and A. Mehrez In reply Med Decis Making, June 1, 1993; 13(2): 168 - 169. [PDF]

				M. N. Levine, A. Gafni, B. Markham, and D. MacFarlane A Bedside Decision Instrument To Elicit a Patient's Preference Concerning Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1992; 117(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]