Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schechter, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schechter, C. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sequential Decision Making with Continuous Disease States and Measurements

II. Application to Diastolic Blood Pressure

Clyde B. Schechter, MD

The model and strategy for sequential decision making using normally distributed measure ments proposed in a companion paper are applied to the problem of diagnosing diastolic hypertension. The assumptions of the model are discussed and justified clinically. Methods for assigning values to the model's parameters are explained and illustrated in the context of a hypothetical "generic" patient. Although current national recommendations and the sequential strategy both lead to an average of 1.89 measurements per patient prior to diagnosis, the sequential strategy applies a sequence of four or more measurements to 12% of patients. Fewer than 1% of patients would require ten or more measurements under this strategy. The sequential strategy leads to fewer patients' receiving unnecessary treatment and substantially higher expected utility for the patient. The role of multiple blood pressure determinations per visit is explored in the absence of appropriate estimates. Even under "best-case" assumptions, however, it is shown that obtaining more than one observation per visit is called for only in about 15% of visits. While the exact role of multiple determinations cannot be specified from existing data, it is likely to be much more limited than current recommendations suggest.

Key Words: Key words: Bayes' theorem • hypertension • conjugate-normal- linear model • decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:256-265)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 4, 256-265 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. Liebhart and E. Krusinska
Classic uersus Sequential Diagnostic Support for Chronic Nonspecific Respiratory Diseases
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1993; 13(2): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. B. Schechter
Sequential Decision Making with Continuous Disease States and Measurements: I. Theory
Med Decis Making, December 1, 1990; 10(4): 242 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]