Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G.M.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunink, M. G.M.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity

ROC Analysis Involving Covariates, Verification Bias, and Combination Testing

Maria G.M. Hunink, MD, PhD

Douglas K. Richardson, MD, MBA

Peter M. Doubilet, MD, PhD

Colin B. Begg, PhD

The lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio (US) and the measured value of saturated phosphatidyl choline (SPC), amniotic fluid determinations obtained to assess fetal pulmonary maturity, were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The effects of covariates on the ROC curves were analyzed with a regression methodology that took into account all the available data when constructing an ROC curve for each subgroup. To correct for verification bias the authors used a logistic regression analysis to model the probability of verification, thereby permitting correction for verification bias of a fully stratified data set in spite of small cell frequencies. They examined combination testing with prediction rules using prospective logistic modeling, including as variables test results and clinical features. The US was found to be significantly better than SPC for assessing fetal pulmonary maturity. For older gestational age the US and SPC performed better than for younger gestational age. Contamination of the specimen degraded the ROC curves. Correcting for verification bias did not influence the ROC curves significantly but changed the cutoff value of the test variable for any particular operating point. Prediction rules to evaluate combination testing showed that obtaining the SPC level in addition to the US ratio added no significant infor mation compared with the US only. Including gestational age in the prediction rule of either test improved the prediction. Key words: receiver operating characteristic curve; fetal pul monary maturity testing; covariates; verification bias; combination testing. (Med Decis Mak ing 1990;10:201-211)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 3, 201-211 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. van Leeuwen, E. J.K. Zweers, B. C. Opmeer, E. van Ballegooie, H. G. ter Brugge, H. W. de Valk, B. W.J. Mol, and G. H.A. Visser
Comparison of Accuracy Measures of Two Screening Tests for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2779 - 2784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Lijmer, B. W. Mol, S. Heisterkamp, G. J. Bonsel, M. H. Prins, J. H. P. van der Meulen, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
JAMA, September 15, 1999; 282(11): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
X.-H. Zhou
Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 1998; 7(4): 337 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. F. Raubertas, L. E. Rodewald, S. G. Humiston, and P. G. Szilagyi
ROC Curves for Classification Trees
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1994; 14(2): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. A. Diamond
What Is the Effect of Sampling Error on ROC Analysis in the Face of Verification Bias?
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1992; 12(2): 155 - 156.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. A. Diamond
Scotched on the ROCs
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 198 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. G.M. Hunink and C. B. Begg
Diamond's Correction Method-A Real Gem or Just Cubic Zirconium?
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 201 - 203.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. A. Hanley
Verification Bias and the One-parameter Logistic ROC Curve--Some Clarifications
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 203 - 207.
[PDF]