Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deber, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goel, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deber, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Goel, V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 3, 181-194 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000305

Using Explicit Decision Rules to Manage Issues of Justice, Risk, and Ethics in Decision Analysis

When Is It Not Rational to Maximize Expected Utility?

Raisa B. Deber, PhD

Vivek Goel, MD, MSc

Concepts of justice, risk, and ethics can be merged with decision analysis by requiring the analyst to specify explicitly a decision rule or sequence of rules. Decision rules are categorized by whether they consider: 1) aspects of outcome distributions beyond central tendencies; 2) probabilities as well as utilities of outcomes; and 3) means as well as ends. This formulation suggests that distribution-based decision rules could address both risk (for an individual) and justice (for the population). Rational choice under risk if choices are one-time only (vs. repeated events) or if one branch contains unlikely but disastrous outcomes might ignore probability information. Incorporating risk attitude into decision rules rather than utilities could facilitate use of multiattribute approaches to measuring outcomes. Certain ethical concerns could be addressed by prior specification of rules for allowing particular branches. Examples, including selection of polio vaccine strategies, are discussed, and theoretical and practical implications of a decision rule approach noted. Key words: decision making; utility theory; decision analysis; ethics; risk; justice. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:181-194)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
J. G. Dolan
A Method for Evaluating Health Care Providers' Decision Making: The Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 38 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
M. E. Cowen, B. J. Miles, D. F. Cahill, R. B. Giesler, J. R. Beck, and M. W. Kattan
The Danger of Applying Group-level Utilities in Decision Analyses of the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer in Individual Patients
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 376 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
M. D. Krahn, G. Naglie, D. Naimark, D. A. Redelmeier, and A. S. Detsky
Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 4-Analyzing the Model and Interpreting the Results
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 142 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]